Asking

ASKING FOR HEALING FROM RACISM

Yes, we protest but not without prayer, and like the psalmists, overwhelmed by the “roar of the waterfalls … the waves and the breakers” our protests are expressed in our prayers of lament. We are ASKing of God in lament, not with worldly sorrow but godly sorrow, which means it is expressing the grief of the heart of God, in the midst of a global pandemic and a global reaction to racism, provoked by the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, United States. Our ASKing cannot but be global. Our mission statement at ASK NETWORK declares that we gather to ASK for “all nations” and if ever there was a time to do so, this is the time.

Two weeks ago I was on a Zoom gathering with 70 pastors in our city of Washington D.C. after the killing of George Floyd in a political context that has seen the uncovering of our nation. We have been meeting together regularly for some time now, building relationships and seeking God’s good for our city. It’s make-up is probably 60% African-American and 40% Hispanic, Asian and Caucasian. We realized that our commitment to relationship over the last five years or so had prepared us for the necessary and hard conversations that we are now having that specifically deal with repentance from racism, and what God is asking of us in terms of holy action in Washington D.C. The next Sunday after the protests began, we saw our churches marching to the Capitol and the White House on a prayer walk, with worship that extolled God’s righteousness and therefore His just character. The question is, will this be just a short-lived reactive or responsive event, or will it be a holy movement of obedience to God’s righteousness and justice, which are the foundations of His throne (Psalm 89:14). When we ASK, this is the throne of grace that ASK Network comes to, ASKing with an open Bible that tells us how to ASK, according to His perfect will, not according to an unrighteous agenda. We ASK according to the Word that God has already spoken about His judgments on evil and wickedness, as well as His resources to obey His commands and be reconciled.

The pastors at that gathering generally agreed that the term ‘racial reconciliation’ needs to be re-exegeted given its assumptions. You can only have a reconciliation if there is something in the past that was good and that was then broken and can now be reconciled. There is no past racial relationship of that kind given the historic roots of the United States with its 400 years-old race problem, and racial alienation still experienced by millions. Our history bears so much shame and racism: with Native Americans (genocide, treaty breaking); with African Americans (only people brought here against their will); with Asians (cheap labor, citizenship exclusions); with Hispanics (vulnerability to exploitation). The reservoir of woundedness is deep, with limited will to sluice the pain and dereliction.  Talking of racial disparities exposed by the global pandemic, there is a serious disparity between God’s vision for us and our present social reality, and of course, there is plenty of evidence for the church’s role in racialization, given that the majority of religious groups are racially homogenous.

What usually happens is that there is a necessary response to racial crisis, and we think our response is reconciliation but it is actually conciliation, which does not mean repentance and restoration, but is about pacifying and placating. This is not God’s kind of peace. It explains why there is no healing and consequent change. Thus Ferguson becomes New York, and then Baltimore  … and then … and then Minneapolis … and then Atlanta. There is a temporary response to an event and it is not a movement of repentance and repair, either personally or locally, either in the church or in the public square of the nation. We return to practiced responses in the face of systemic and systematic racism. We minimize and marginalize it. We individualize it, blind to the collective and institutionalization of it, and we popularize it with simplified repetitions of misguided assumptions. We stigmatize it, defending ourselves by blame shifting and deflecting the attention away from necessary confession and repentance. We vaporize it with a selective and convenient memory that hardens into national amnesia. 

“Contempt is becoming a cultural phenomenon.  It’s seeping into every banal aspect of our lives. Not just anger, though there’s plenty of that, too. No, I mean pure, unabashed, undignified contempt for fellow humanity. This is so toxic.” This quotation is an example of the way that even secular cultural commentators are beginning to realize the horror of it. Contempt is the characteristic demonic response to the presence and purposes of God, to the commands and character of God. The enemy has always opposed our experience of the presence of God with contempt: for Christ, for ourselves, for others. This results in our despising of God, others and self.  What was the opening satanic volley in the record of scripture? “Has God really said?” (Genesis3:1) Contempt is the first manifestation of the diabolic subversion of God’s presence which led to the expulsion from Eden and the loss of “the sound of the Lord God as He was walking in the garden.” 

Healing begins with the confession of contempt. White supremacy and superiority is a principality and power, rooted in contempt that is demonically and satanically energized to throw back into God’s face the demeaning and despising of the imago dei, the image of God. The gospel emphasizes the need for ALL of us to experience healing for all of our false identities, and healing from the consequences of the loss of God’s creational order in our personal lives, ethnicities and societies.

There are three main constituent elements of contempt:

  • Condemnation and consequent judgment: someone or something has failed to meet our privatized standards for behavior or whatever are our self-preferred, self-chosen social, cultural, racial, emotional, intellectual or even spiritual norms. The more we elevate our unquestioned individualism and sense of personal rights, the more we idolize our preferences and particularities, then the more we have to condemn and hold in contempt.

  • Superiority and consequent separation (segregation) and distance because we’re better than someone. It’s all about hubris, vanity, pretension, conceit, disdain, condescension, insolence, pretentiousness, presumption, pomposity, aggression, narcissism, brazenness, incivility, shamelessness, and any of self-love’s progeny like self-admiration, self-exaltation, self-confidence, self-assurance, self-reliance, self-righteousness – it’s about superiority and supremacy. 

  • Hostility and consequently the desire for someone to be removed, whether from sight, the public square, the relationship, or the job. There are plenty of ways for the hostility of contempt to remove someone, including just ignoring them. But murder? That’s taking it too far. I’d never do that, we say. That’s a bit extreme! Not according to Jesus when he redefined our understanding of murder in Mt. 5: 21-26. Jesus describes the separation and distance of contempt as equivalent with murder that separates someone’s life irremediably from all relationship and guarantees reconciliation will be irrecoverable. Listen to Jesus: “You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ But I tell you that anyone who is angry with their brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother ‘Raca!’ is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.” What do you make of that? ‘Raca’ was an Aramaic term of malicious contempt, imposing inferiority on the one so named. Isn’t it interesting that Jesus’ teaching on reconciliation with a brother or someone to whom you are indebted (unreconciled accounts) follows this warning about contempt – the great cause of irreconciliation and the great barrier therefore to reconciliation. This is evil name calling, as all name-calling is evil. Why? Because it removes the significance of the real name, of personhood and personality, of creational uniqueness. To call someone Raca or Fool was to strip them of their identity and impose on them a false identity. Contempt is identity theft. It makes someone what they are not, and thus we dehumanize and demonize, as we determine what is and is not human. Genesis 9:6 tells us why murder is so heinous: “for God made man in His image.” So if contempt is equivalent to murder then you now know why God takes it so personally and judges it so severely: it is primarily against Him, His image, before it is against that person or that race. These elements alone give us an analysis of the present state of the civic soul. 

Contempt is the nature of the devil and all that is diabolic (‘diabolos’ means hurler of slander); of evil; of pride in particular; of the root of sin; of all falsehood, heresy, division and schism. It is the nature of the last days. And nowhere does this contempt more masquerade than in the relational divisions and racial irreconciliations of our nations. Whether violator or victim, we have our own infected and infested systemic corruptions of viral contempt for God, for others and for self, deeply embedded in a history past, despicably maintained in a history present, and seemingly doomed to continue in a history future. ‘Prejudice’ is just not strong enough a word. We need to come to terms with the darkness of our acidic, deforming contempt – deforming of self, and others, and thus of the image of God. Prejudiced? We are contemptuous. To destroy God’s image is to erect our own in its place which makes us idolaters of the most egregious kind, while we mouth “in God we trust”. There cannot be transformation without the excising of the deformation of contempt. The words of Jesus Himself should be our warning and our motivation to get reconciled. The contempt that wants someone to be removed, to disappear, to become persona non grata, to become invisible in the system, to vaporize in color-blindness, is the sin of murder.

This may seem like a lot of bad news. However, if we have been cut down by any kind of despising, personal or corporate, familial, parental, or racial – God happens to specialize in choosing despised things (1 Corinthians 1:28) and forgiving and changing despising people. God specializes in removing reproach, removing the roots that cause us to despise others; removing the garments of reproach with which others may have clothed our characters and spirits. From Genesis 30:23 onwards God says, “I have rolled away the reproach of Egypt.” How has God done this? How has he absorbed all despising that we may be absolved of it? The answer is the core of the gospel: in His own body on a tree. He became the toxic waste dump of the world’s despising. He was “despised and rejected of men … He was despised and we did not esteem Him” (Isaiah 53:3). No one was ever more drained of esteem than Jesus, or held in more contempt. One of the most often quoted psalms in the gospels, with reference to the cross, not surprisingly has this emphasis: “I am a worm … a reproach of men and despised by the people … All those who see me ridicule me … They shoot out the lip … He trusted in the Lord … Let him rescue him” (Psalm 22: 6-8). And after this concentrated horror of despising comes an unbelievable delivering truth: “God has not despised the suffering of the afflicted.” When anyone is moved to repent of the ways they have despised Him and not esteemed Him, God takes the repentant response as personally as He took the sin of despising: “a broken and a contrite heart I will not despise.” There is forgiveness for our despising, there is deliverance from its bondages and healing from its defacements of identity and spirit.

What we will celebrate next time we take communion, in whatever setting, in whatever nation, regardless of tribe, language or people, is nothing less than revolutionary.  It is not even about ‘integration’ of our old selves, or about social diversity – it is about becoming one “new man.” What meets at communion is not a variety of races, but one race, one church. Within that race are many different faces, dances and songs, traditions, regalia, tastes – but as Revelation shows us, when they are all gathered around the throne (including some really weird looking creatures!) there is no self-consciousness, as the work of Jesus has flushed out the beauty and brilliance of our creational individuality, surrendered to God, and there is no room anymore for the rights and claims of our individualism and our identities. So often we seek, well-meaningly, to resolve our sins in the context of brotherhood. In the racially divided church, we live as if we have a common mother (the church) but a different Father. A recovery of a common Fatherhood, of our equal sonship and daughterhood, is biblically necessary if there is going to be change. When Father runs the table that we meet at, no elder-brother spirit is going to control the conversation or the consequences. Racial justice does not begin first in our brotherhood, but in God’s Fatherhood, and thus we ask Father for a revelation of His heart that wills that every ethnicity and nationality will be at that throne. Racial justice does not begin from the ground up, but from the throne down as we ask “Let your kingdom come on earth as it is in heaven.” Amen.

Use these scriptures to meditate and ASK for racism to stop in all our nations:

  • So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.  There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.  If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.  Galatians 3:26-29

  • My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message,  that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me.  I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one—I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.  John 17:20-23

Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does not love their brother and sister, whom they have seen, cannot love God, whom they have not seen. 1 John 4:2

UNCIRCUMCISED EAR

Dearest Family,

The ministrations of Moses (the Law) and Elijah (the Prophets) to Jesus on Mount Tabor, recorded in Matthew 17 and Luke 9, mark the beginning of Jesus’ final assault on the hill, Golgotha. On Sunday I drew your attention to the words that the Father spoke out of the heavens, the same word that inaugurated Jesus’ ministry at His baptism. Before the experience prophetically foreseen and described by Isaiah in his 53rd chapter, of absolute rejection and absolute despising and contempt, and absolute desertion, He needed absolute acceptance and absolute affirmation and absolute assurance.

And is that not what that voice is all about. “This is my son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. LISTEN TO HIM!” I have always been gripped by those last words. “LISTEN TO HIM!” The Father is drawing attention to the necessity not to miss, not to misunderstand, not to mistake, not to misinterpret a single word that is about to come out of his mouth in this final stretch to the cross. It should strike us as strange. Wouldn’t you expect it to have said, “Look at Him!” Think about it! They’re in the moment. There was already the “glorious splendor” of Moses and Elijah to rivet the gaze, but the text says of Jesus: “the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became as bright as a flash of lightning.” It says, “they saw his glory.” Was this what John, who was there, described when he saw it again on Patmos: “His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were blazing like fire…His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.” (Rev. 1:14-16) But the voice didn’t say “Look at Him!” but “Listen to Him!” And there’s the rub. Our hearing. Our listening.

Following the Transfiguration it’s interesting to note that Jesus immediately delivers a demonized boy and everyone is wowed. “They were all amazed at the greatness of God” (Luke 9:43). Then we read this. “While everyone was marveling at what Jesus did, he said to his disciples, Listen carefully to what I am about to tell you.” Listening then becomes a repeated theme, a repeated request and encouragement. Of those who were the 72, not just the special 12, Jesus says: “He who listens to you listens to me” (Luke 10:16). It is Jesus speaking through them so it is credited by Jesus Himself as the word of the Lord. At the end of that discipleship training session, Jesus speaks privately to the 12, saying that there were many prophets and kings who wanted “to hear what you hear” (10:24). The chapter ends with the incident at Bethany with Martha clanging pots in the kitchen to get attention to how hard she is working for Jesus to serve Him supper. Mary was quietly sitting at Jesus’ feet. This is always used as a picture of devotion, and that’s true but why is that so? Just because she happened to be with Jesus, close to Him? Often the point is missed. The text says she was “listening to what He said” (Luke 10:39)

John’s narrative leading up to Palm Sunday is a little different, with a different selection of key exchanges, but interestingly enough, on His final journey to the cross, and He’s getting very close now, after His extraordinary explanation of why He is the bread of life, and why eternal life is utterly predicated on our relationship with His flesh and His blood, Jesus hears something. The text says he was “aware that His disciples were grumbling” (John 6:61). John reported earlier grumbling from the Jews as Jesus spoke. How interesting that Jesus described the experience of receiving “everlasting life” like this: “Everyone who listens to the Father and learns from Him comes to me” (6:45) Five verses after His disciples’ grumbling we read: “From this time many of His disciples March 18, 2018 turned back and no longer followed Him.” In my lifetime I don’t think I’ve ever witnessed more people doing the same thing for the same reason. “On hearing it, many of His disciples said, This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?” (v60)

I gave plenty of scriptural examples on Sunday of the kind of ears that the Bible say make for both good and bad hearing. The calls to hear, to listen, are the bookends of Jesus’ ministry in the New Testament, as incarnate Christ in the Gospels and glorified Christ in Revelation. The very last words addressed by the Spirit to the reader of the Bible are: “Let him who hears, come” (Revelation 22:17). But I concluded by drawing your attention to what God said through Jeremiah, describing the people’s “uncircumcised ear” that took offence at what they heard, and to Jesus’ similar response to those who could not listen to what He was saying: “Do I offend you?”

You will have to re-listen to the message to get the meat of what I shared but let me repeat this. If we are going to pursue the hard conversations, if we are going to press through despite failures and wounds in the pursuit of racial reconciliation in the church, then we have to have circumcised ears that listen, that hear then commanding voice of Jesus, that hear both the words and the hearts of others, and ears that refuse to take offence, tutoring our speech that learns not to give it – that will admit it when it happens, that will confess and forgive it when it happens, that will minister to it when it happens in the way Jesus told us to in Matthew 5:34-35 – love, bless, do good and pray. There’s going to be a lot of praying coming down. Receive this 40 days as just a warm up practice.

So COSC, how is our hearing? What would the results be of a spiritual hearing test? Is there hearing loss in our spiritual life? Is spiritual hearing blocked, injured, infected? Are we showing symptoms of hearing loss in our discipleship, avoiding the counsel of friends and family and the Lord? Do we listen? What is the Lord saying to you these days? Do you hear only what you once heard and are now living off old conversations long since over? Does the Lord speak to you? Do you expect him to? Do you really want him to? Do you invite him to? Do you need him to? Do you need a word from heaven? Is there something he has said that you have refused to hear? Is there something you have heard that you have chosen to pretend was not spoken? Is your hearing selective? Have you got good at tuning him out? Is your ear itching for something that suits your desires that will justify your choices and support your preferences? (Stop confronting us with the Holy one of Israel…tell us pleasant things!) Do you need the oil of the Holy Spirit poured in to your ears this morning to clear the passage to your heart? We hear what we want to hear. I think it was Marshall McLuhan who reminded folk that we have no ear lids yet we are practiced at selective listening. Do we need our deafness healed?

So let’s take heed to what the Bible teaches. From beginning to end, it gives reason after reason why we either don’t listen or cannot hear: pride, untruth, self-satisfaction, rebellion, disobedience, idolatry, unbelief, cynicism, shame, unconfessed and unrepented sin, unteachableness, distraction, loving the sound of our own voice more than his, unbelief, willfulness, stubbornness, offence. The Lord is telling us to hear what the Spirit says in these days, so we cannot afford to be dull of hearing for any of these reasons. A uncircumcised ear is evidence of an uncircumcised heart. Let’s put the ear back in heart!

Listening with you,
Stuart

EFFECTIVE ASKING

“What various hindrances we meet
When coming to the Mercy Seat.”
William Cowper

“The prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective.”
James 5:16

ASKING: INEFFECTIVE OR EFFECTIVE?

READING: JAMES 1: 5-8; 4: 2-3; 5:16

In one of his discourses on the Sermon on the Mount, John Wesley dealt with the discouragements and frustrations that attend the efforts to live righteously and witness engagingly. After suggesting some ways to respond he said that there “is yet another remedy left; and one that is frequently found effectual when no other method avails … ask and it shall be given you.” We should never be ashamed to state the obvious. To be effective in anything, especially in your asking you first have to be “effectual” by just asking! You only learn to ask by asking.

As we embark on 40 days of asking it would seem a reasonable, not to say advisable, matter to affirm what makes for effective asking, assuming that is what we are hoping our asking will be. I’m going to stand you in front of a hydrant and give you a broad but condensed multipoint presentation of some things that will make for ineffective asking and some that will make for effective asking. Does that sound like a helpful thing to do on the eve of this 40 day commitment to asking?

A qualifying word from James
One of the most commonly cited verses on prayer is James 5:16 “The prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective.” What is meant by ‘effective’? In our mind, the word implies that something is successful because something is working, but what, and who? Translators have argued and disagreed about the participle of the verb ‘energeo’ (‘energoumene’) used here. Is it to be understood in the middle voice as “is able to do” or in the passive voice, “is enabled to do”? Is the emphasis on what we do to make it effective, or on what we are enabled to do to make it effectual.

There does seem to be a conditioning of the possible effectiveness of asking by the designation of the asker as “righteous.” Unrighteousness does not make for effective asking. What is clear is that whatever the reason for the effectiveness, the end result is a powerful prayer, most likely because a righteous person is operating in the will of God, including of course God’s will that they live a holy life. But even as true as that is, it will not do to read this verse as though effectiveness ultimately had to do with our state of righteousness while we are asking. We know where this can lead, as affirmed by Jesus’ parable of the Publican and Pharisee. The problem is with the word “effective” (NIV, NRSV), particularly as it is commonly used now, having to do with results and getting things done.

The emphasis here is not on what needs to be done according to our asking, but on how it is being done and who is ultimately doing it. For certain, it is not the righteous asker. The translations that use the word “effectual” (AKJV, KJ21) help us to get nearer the meaning, and nearer to the meaning of my message. Though less used now, the word “effectual” is perhaps better, because it suggests a different nuance. It is usually used of inanimate or abstract things that attain a desired result. This puts the emphasis less on what we do to make asking effective, and more on the idea that asking is a means for someone else’s desire to be effected.

Furthermore, the root of the word that James uses is the Greek word ‘energeo’ which explains itself in the key contexts in which it is used. It conveys the idea of something “working in” or to put it another way, something “inwrought”. This is how Paul describes faith (Galatians 5:6), the Word (1Thessalonians 2:13), and grace (Ephesians 3:7) in believers’ lives. They have been “inwrought” and if not by them, by who? What is this “inwrought” power of Ephesians 1:19 but “the working of His inner strength”? Paul makes this clear in another decisive statement about asking:Now to Him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to His power that is at work in us” (Ephesians 3:20). That which is “inwrought” in us when we are asking, the power that is effectual, and that consequently makes our asking effective, is exactly what Paul has just talked about and asked for: “I ask that out of His glorious riches He may strengthen you with power through His Spirit in your inner being.” So Paul and James are totally agreed. So are the asking saints, like E.M.Bounds, who knew that our ability and our power to ask was “dependent on the measure of the Holy Spirit received by us, dwelling in us and working through us.” There is no effective asking without the “inwrought” working of the Holy Spirit.

Our asking is the evidence, not primarily of our formulations, but of the Spirit’s utterance in and through us. It is not the result of a few prayer techniques that we have mastered in order to be a really effective asker, but of the Spirit’s help and instruction. Our effectiveness has to do with the power that works in us and therefore enables us to ask powerfully, not with our ability to develop a method and means to ask effectively in our own strength and wisdom. In any case, did not James begin his epistle with the need to ask for wisdom from God in order to ask aright for anything?

Why is all this important? Because I am not using the word ‘effective’ this morning in a way that implies that because we do certain things we can guarantee the effectiveness of our asking, and thus make a work out of it, or think we have the means to assure its success. Nothing could be further from the truth. However, I am going to be suggesting in the first part of my message that there are some things that we are responsible for and that we do that can definitely render our asking ineffective.

PART 1: INEFFECTIVE ASKING
Having established that God is a God who hears our asking, scripture presents not just what God chooses to hear, but also what He refuses to hear. This has huge implications for our assumptions about prayer, and our expectations of our asking. It is quite salutary to go through the scriptures and discover how many times God explicitly says He will not listen to what is asked of Him, or He will choose not to hear. Sometimes His choice not to hear is a response to our choice not to listen or heed His word and commands. Just as Jesus said that our refusal to forgive runs interference with our own reception of forgiveness, so God makes clear that there is a divinely reciprocated response in His hearing, to our refusal to hear. After all, is it not true that we cease to speak to someone who has ceased to listen to what we are saying, and cease to listen to someone who repeatedly fails to respond to what we have said? Surely then, before we ask for 40 days, it is worth checking if there are any reasons which might contribute to our asking being in vain, simply because God will choose not to hear. It will feel to us that He has not heard or cannot hear. No, God hears. What he does is refuse to hear for specified reasons; He chooses not to listen.

The following scriptural examples that I am going to give you are important because they affirm that God is a Person and not some cosmic impersonal slot machine where certain input gets certain output; as if we ask and out pops the answer, custom wrapped for our fleshly consumption. We are not heard simply by virtue of our asking. Scripture, including our reading from James, identifies reasons for unanswered asking: asking for wrong things, asking of wrong sources, asking in wrong ways, asking when in the wrong. What follows will be a helpful list to check two things:
1. the possible presumption in our asking;
2. the continuance of those things in our lives that are not consistent with those whose asking is meant to be an expression of their intimate relationship with the Lord.

Some requests may have a reasonable and laudable face value when verbalized, and may even pass theological muster, but the Lord not only hears our words, He sees our heart. While I am asking for and about those things that affect my relationship with my world, God is concerned about what affects my relationship with Him. Here are some of the biblical reasons given for God’s refusal to hear what is asked, so it would be helpful for us to go into these 40 days without bearing any of these hindrances and impediments that will render our asking ineffective.

1. Choosing other lordship: “Give us a king to lead us … you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, and the Lord will not answer you in that day” (1 Samuel 8:18). Divine lordship has been abandoned in favor of human leadership. Trusting men has been preferred to trusting God. Human security and protection is more desired than the presence of God. If we serve other lordship God will not hear.
2. Willful disobedience: “The Lord was angry with me and would not listen to me” (Deuteronomy 3:26). God’s anger was because of Moses’ disobedience. Basically, God is saying: “That is enough. Do not speak to me any more about this matter.” Or in other words, “There is no point in asking me again. Do not ask for something that I cannot and will not do.” If there is willful disobedience God will not hear.
4. Living a double life: “Do not plead with me for I will not listen to you” (Jeremiah 7:16). This is God’s response to His people’s private worship of the Queen of Heaven, while paying public lip-service to the temple. They were asking while they were “two-timing” God. “Will you steal and commit adultery and follow other gods and then come and stand before me in my house and say, ‘We’re safe – safe to do all these things’” (vs. 9-11). You can ask for blessing and immunity all you want but God will not bless what you are asking for, because of the conditions of the asking heart. “Has this house, which bears my name, become a den of robbers to you?” This is a chilling passage because it is the same one that Jesus quotes when He casts the money-changers out of the temple and re-establishes it as a house of “asking” (Matthew 21:12-13). It is clear at the end of the chapter that God is responding in kind because He says to Jeremiah, “When you tell them all this, they will not listen to you; when you call to them they will not answer.” They do not answer God about what He is asking of them through the prophet, yet they expect Him to answer what they are asking of Him. When there is the deception and duplicity of a double-life God will not hear.
5. Refusal to be compassionate to others: “Administer true justice; show mercy and compassion to one another … But they refused to pay attention … When I called they did not listen; when they called I would not listen” (Zechariah 7:13). The specific issue is their refusal to heed when the Lord speaks about justice. The chapter begins with God answering something they had asked about (“should I mourn and fast?” v3) with asking of His own (“Was it really for me that you fasted?” v5). The problem is that their asking is utterly self consumed and self-enhancing. It was all about “feasting for themselves” (v6). Despite what God was asking of them, it says “they refused to pay attention … they stopped their ears” (v11). This is what provokes the divine response to “not listen.” When a compassionate response is asked for while with-holding compassion, God will not hear.
6. Disregard for injustice and denial of justice:If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered” (Proverbs 21:13); “On the day of your fasting you exploit all your workers … you cannot fast as you do today and expect your voice to be heard on high” (Isaiah 58:4); “Should you not know justice? They will cry out to the Lord but He will not answer him” (Micah 4:2-4). The deliberate avoidance of the afflictions of those who are the victims of injustice, results in a divine refusal to hear what they ask for. A lack of generosity is also implied here as there is a contradiction between asking more for oneself while denying what another needs. When Paul tells the Philippians that God will supply their needs when they ask, it is clearly because they have already been generous in supplying the needs of others. Effective askers are usually those with generous and giving spirits. Freely we receive in response to our asking, therefore freely we give. If God’s justice is willfully disregarded He will not hear.
7. Appearance without reality: They seek me out; they seem eager to know my ways as if they were a nation that does what is right … They ask me for just decisions and seem eager for God to come near them” (Isaiah 58:2). They appear to be concerned and desirous but there is a divine “YET!” (v3) What they “seem” is not what they are and it negates their asking. God explains that the answers to their asking are conditional on their choice of what He has chosen, not their self-oriented choices. He clearly spells out what that will require of them (vs.6-7). “THEN … you will call and the Lord will answer, you will cry for help and the Lord will say ‘Here I am’”. Where there is appearance without reality, God will not hear.
8. Unconfessed and unrepented sin:If I had cherished iniquity in my heart the Lord would not have listened” (Psalm 66:18). The problem here is the expectation that God will be responsive to anything we ask while we persist in ignoring the things that interfere with relationship, and that are an offence to God. “Your sins have hidden His face from you so He will not hear” (Isaiah 59:2). This is referring to a habitual life-style of sin that results in God not listening to what is asked, so there will be no answers. Where the eyes of God are covered, the ears of God are covered too. If iniquity is harbored, God will not hear.
9. Failure to acknowledge and accept God’s wisdom: “Wisdom calls aloud … since you rejected me when I called … since you ignored all my advice … and would not accept my rebuke … they will call to me but I will not answer” (Proverbs 1: 20-28). You have to listen in order to be listened to. Fools will not be given a wise answer. “Answer a fool according to his folly” (Proverbs 26:5). The answer to the fool’s asking is silence. Those addressed did not choose the fear of the Lord, and they would not accept the advice of wisdom. In the New Testament, the book of James is like a commentary on Proverbs and it makes clear (James 1:5) that if we are humble and admit our need of God’s wisdom, then an amazing invitation is extended: “let him ask of God who gives generously.” Submission to the wisdom of God attracts a generous and a gracious response to our asking. Where there is a failure to submit to God’s wisdom, God will not hear.
10. Deliberate rejection of God’s law:If anyone turns a deaf ear to the law even his prayers are detestable” (Proverbs 28:9). Again, here is an example of God’s refusal to respond to what is asked for by someone who insists on shutting their ears to the holiness and justice of God, rejecting truth and disdaining God’s laws. In such a case, God will not hear.
11. Pride:If my people … will humble themselves and ask … then will I hear from heaven” (2 Chronicles 7:14). Humility opens the ears of God. Pride therefore closes them to our asking. “I will break down your stubborn pride and make the sky above you like iron” (Leviticus 26:19). There is no responsiveness from heaven to the prideful, because God will not hear.
12. Idolatry:These men have set up idols in their hearts and put wicked stumbling blocks before their faces. Should I let them ask of me at all?” (Ezekiel 14:3). “You continue to defile yourselves with all your idols … Am I to let you inquire of me? ... I will not let you inquire of me!” (Ezekiel 20:31) The only answer the Lord says He will give is to separate Himself from anyone who separates themselves from Him by their indulgence in idolatrous thinking and living. That separation is a break-down of communication which means no possibility for asking, so God will not hear.
13. Ritualistic repetition:Do not keep on babbling like the pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words” (Matthew 6:7). Vain, superstitious verbosity and volubility is not the way to ask if you want to be heard. God will not hear it.
13. Ritualistic repetition:Do not keep on babbling like the pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words” (Matthew 6:7). Vain, superstitious verbosity and volubility is not the way to ask if you want to be heard. God will not hear it.
14. Unforgiveness:If you do not forgive men their sins, your father will not forgive your sins” (Matthew 6:15). Our asking for forgiveness will go unheeded if we bear unforgiveness in our hearts. There may be many things that are maintaining the unforgiveness, like bitterness, unhealed pain, continuing strife, the vindictive desire for punishment, or the ongoing wishing of ill upon the offender. If we willfully retain unforgiveness in our hearts, God will not hear.
15. Disunity:If two of you agree about anything you ask for it will be done” (Matthew 18:19). If unity is a condition for asking effectively, then lack of agreement and dissension will invalidate our asking. Disunity, irreconciliation and disagreement render our asking null and void. God will not hear.
16. Enmity: Jesus addresses the consequences of anger and enmity in His teaching, and points out that the posture of worship, whether we are giving or asking, is rendered ineffective, unless we first “go and be reconciled to your brother” (Matthew 5:23-24). Wesley taught that if asking was “to have its full weight with God” then it was imperative that we be living “in charity with all men” 5 or God will not hear.
17. Hypocrisy:They love to pray … to be seen by men … I thank you I’m not like other men … God have mercy on me … this man rather than the other went home justified before God” (Luke 18: 9-14). The Pharisee in Jesus’ parable did not leave justified like the asking Publican, but left just the same. The Pharisee was not heard. Insincerity was not heeded. Where there is hypocrisy, God will not hear.
18. Double-mindedness:When he asks he must believe and not doubt … That man should not think he will receive anything from the Lord” (James 1:6-7). Where there is double-mindedness and doubt there will be no authority in asking. Equally, there will be no capacity to receive, even if answered. Jesus was so clear that the one who asked for a mountain to be moved should have “no doubt in his heart.” Although some of the things we ask for are staggering, we are exhorted to heed Abraham’s example who “staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief, but was strong in faith giving glory to God” (Romans 4:20). Where doubt persists, asking eventually ceases. As Calvin remarked, “If you doubt you do not pray.” Where there is double-mindedness there will be no authority in asking and God will not hear.
19. Broken marital relationships:Husbands … be considerate as you live with your wives … treat them with respect … so that nothing will hinder your prayers” (1 Peter 3:7). Inappropriate, un-Christlike behavior and sins against spouses run interference with our asking. Trading presumptuously on a sense of intimacy with God, when marital intimacy is not being cherished or protected, is inviting a hindrance to our asking. If we are sinning against our spouse God will not hear.
20. Condemnation: If our hearts do not condemn us, we have confidence before God and receive from Him anything we ask” (1 John 3:21). Where there is condemnation there is a block both on the freedom to ask with assurance, and on the reception of what we ask for. If our hearts condemn us, God will not hear.
21. Not asking according to His will:If we ask anything according to His will He hears us” (1 Jn. 5:14). God cannot be asked to act against His own character or purpose. If we do not ask according to His will, God will not hear.
22. Asking with wrong motives: “”You do not receive because you ask with wrong motives, that you may spend it on your pleasures” (James 4:3). When asking is fueled by wrong motives rooted in the lust and covetousness, fighting and warring that James refers to, there will be no answers. It is clear that the motive for asking is utterly self-serving and good things can be requested for bad reasons. Simon Magus asked for the Holy Spirit, a good thing, but with godless motives (Acts 8:18-19). If the motivation for the request is not to delight oneself in the Lord, then the asked-for desire is unlikely to be given (Psalm 37:4). The Lord searches the heart and discerns the motivation behind our asking. The litmus test for our motives in asking is simple but direct: is what we ask for to gratify ourselves or to glorify God? If wrong motives are present, God will not hear.
23. Asking wrong sources:My people ask counsel of their stocks, and are answered by a stick of wood” (Hosea 4:12). Asking of wrong sources, from God’s perspective, is “a spirit of prostitution”. When they do have a need to ask, “they will not find Him” (Hosea 5:6). The divine pain is explicit whenever Israel appointed prophets, priests and kings of their own making, and ceased to inquire of the Lord. “They have not asked at my mouth” (Isaiah 30:2). “They didn’t ask, ‘Where is the Lord?’” (Jeremiah 2:6) They carried out their own plans, asking counsel of unholy consultants and forming alliances other than relationship with God. When Saul chose to ask of the witch of Endor instead of the Lord, he lost his kingdom (1 Samuel 28:7). When Ahaziah sent messengers to consult BaalZebub, the god of Ekron, God told Elijah to ask these emissaries, “Is it because there is no God in Israel? ...You will surely die!” (2 Kings 1:3). When wrong sources offer themselves, the need to ask of God is imperative. “When men tell you to consult mediums and spiritists, who whisper and mutter, should not a people inquire of the Lord?” (Isaiah 8:19) Getting direction from others displaces asking of God. The consequences are dangerous and disastrous. God will not hear.
24. Asking for wrong things:They put God to the test by demanding the things they craved” (Psalm 78:18). This is rooted in the same lust that James speaks about. When Solomon asked for wisdom, the difference between asking for right and wrong things is made clear. “The Lord was pleased that Solomon had asked for this … and not for long life or wealth for yourself … I will do what you have asked” (1Kings 3:10-11). If we ask for wrong things God will not hear.
25. Asking that is really accusing: The prophet Isaiah foresaw Jesus as a lamb that was dumb before its shearers: “so He did not open His mouth” (Isaiah 53:7). There was plenty of asking going on, and in any other context they would have been good questions to ask. “Are you the one who was to come?” (Luke 7:20) when asked of Jesus by John the Baptist, is very different to: “Are you the Christ?” (Mark 14:61) when asked by Caiaphas. As with all these points, it is not that God is deaf. He chooses not to hear. The silence of Jesus, as if he did not hear, is the divine response to that which is asked in anger and contempt, in mockery and accusation. It is not genuinely interrogative but deliberately derogatory. How much asking is addressed to God from the place of bitter cynicism, or challenging defiance, or personal enmity? Asking that is accusing will not be heard.
26. Failure to ask: “You have not because you ask not” (James 4:2-3). It is important to state the obvious. God cannot and will not hear what is not spoken. God presents Himself, time and time again in scripture, as the God who wants to be addressed, wants to be asked. “Ask of me!” (Psalm 2:8) Go to God and “take words with you” pleads Hosea (14:2). If we will not ask, God will not hear, because He has nothing to hear! It has been said that the greatest tragedy of life is not unanswered prayer but unoffered prayer.

It would be easy to be disheartened by all this and limit our asking to the question: what hope? But that would be to completely miss the point. God is not trying to make Himself less approachable but more so. If we are going to ask rightly and effectively, it makes sense that we know as much as possible about wrong kinds of asking. God has a vested interest that nothing hinders our asking, because He wants to relate to us. Thus the practice of asking is such an invitation of grace to live in a manner that is worthy of our confession of Christ. Not to ask God is actually not to ask some crucial questions of ourselves. The neglect of asking turns out to be a neglect of personal spiritual health.

PART II: EFFECTIVE ASKING

We began this message by noting many scriptural reasons for why God chooses not to listen to what we ask, or chooses to refuse to hear what we ask, as unwelcome as this feels. It follows then that to ask effectively we should ensure that we are heard and that none of those exclusions or hindrances that were mentioned apply to us. If they do, you can deal with these this morning at this altar rail and walk out of here ready to begin these 40 days as an asker who can be confident that God hears you. All recovered asking begins with the asking for forgiveness. But just as there are so many possible impediments and interferences to asking, so there are also many godly factors that help our asking to be more effective.

If you want to get more effective at something, you have to begin by engaging it. Just start doing it. You can read all the books you like about tennis but you will never have an effective volley if you never get onto the court and get to the net. All the books in the world about prayer may be encouraging, but if you are not asking personally they are ineffective. So what makes for effective asking? Beginning to ask and then keeping on asking. Isn’t that how Jesus put it?

The next 40 days, if you choose to participate, will be like a 40 day discipleship course, a 40 day personal spiritual renewal experience. Haven’t we just seen how convicting, cleansing and sanctifying it can be by just dealing with those things that hinder our asking being heard? Why will these 40 days be like this? Because asking, by its very nature, activates the context in which so much is matured and changed in our lives, precisely because it relates us to God, and in that relationship we are confronted and convicted, nurtured and nourished, taught and touched. Asking forces us to stop and think about what we really want for life and godliness, and thus purifies our future asking. Yes, it convinces us how much we need, and how far we are from asking effectively, but that revelation in itself is a tremendously effective first-fruits of asking. Just asking becomes a bondage-breaker: breaking the silence in our communication with God, breaking the fear about asking specifically, breaking the lies of the enemy about why it’s no use for us to ask, breaking the deception that we can get by without it, breaking the pride of our independence. As Forsyth put it, just the act of asking serves to “relax the tension of our self-inflation.” Asking is a holy end in itself, before it is ever about answers. So if you just start asking, you are on your way to effective asking.

However, there are some considerations, and perhaps conditioning factors, that we should be aware of when we come to ask of God. When we pay heed to these, we will find that our need and desire to ask becomes what I have just suggested, a huge contribution to our sanctification, to our maturing godliness, to our maturing discipleship. Asking is what disciples of Jesus do, and as we ask the Father, because it is such a means of grace, we will find ourselves in the classroom of the Holy Spirit, learning of Christ, and we will continue to receive the blessing of something that Paul asked for disciples: “I keep asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious Father, may give you the Spirit of wisdom and revelation, so that you may know Him better.” (Ephesians 1:17) Is that not the learning (to know him better) that discipleship is all about? We will continue to note that all three persons of the Godhead are actively involved every time we ask. We ask of the Father, through the mediation of the Son by the power of the Holy Spirit. How can we feel short of help? What follows now on the power-points are some scriptural encouragements for your engagement in effectual asking.

1. Knowing Jesus as personal Lord and Savior
“Believe me when I say that I am in the Father, and the Father is in me … I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will do what I have been doing … And I will do whatever you ask in my name.” (John14:11-13) The invitation to ask and the promise to respond is made especially to those who put their faith in Jesus. We are confident in our asking, because our confidence is in Jesus Christ. Because we have acknowledged Jesus as our Savior, as the one who bore the penalty of our sins, then we who were once separated from God and incommunicado, can now draw near and ask, not as strangers, but as sons and daughters of His Father, because as an earlier verse in John’s gospel says, “all who received Him, to those who believed in His name, He gave the right to become children of God.” (John 1:12) Knowing Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior conditions our asking.

2. Knowing God’s acceptance
“… so that you may know that you have eternal life. This is the confidence we have in approaching God … that if we ask” (1John 5:13). We have been forgiven and cleansed by the blood of Christ, which gives assurance about our acceptance and therefore our access and our asking. Our asking is accepted because we have been made acceptable to the Father through Christ. “We know that we are children of God” (1John 5:19). Where there is acceptance there is assurance. Where there is assurance there is access. Where there is access, there is asking. Knowing we are accepted and acceptable conditions our asking.

3. Confessing sin
We have seen that “iniquity in my heart” (Psalm 66:18) is a barrier to asking, thus choosing to live a life that keeps short accounts with God makes for effective asking. We have just seen that James 5:16 is explicit that the asking of a “righteous” man is effectual. The debris of unconfessed sin blocks the spiritual arteries, and silences asking. It is the confession of sin that restarts asking by first asking for forgiveness. Confession conditions our asking.

4. Humility
Asking, that is a true confession of need, requires humility. If people will “humble themselves” then God says that He “will forgive their sins” (2 Chronicles 7:14). “But the tax collector stood at a distance. He would not even look up to heaven, but beat his breast and said, ‘God have mercy on me a sinner … this man went home justified.” (Luke18:13-14) The pride of the Pharisee at prayer, and the prideful asking of Herod before Jesus, are met with silence. “Stubborn pride” encounters heaven that is “like iron” (Leviticus 26:19). Asking will not be answered. G. Campbell Morgan used to say that “all God’s thrones are reached by going downstairs.” “He hears the cry of the humble” (Psalm 10:17). Humility asks and pride does not. Humility conditions our asking.

5. Believing
“Whatever you ask for, believe that you have received it” (Mark 11:24). “If you believe you will receive whatever you ask for” (Matthew 21:22). “He who believes in Me, the works that I do shall he do also … Whatever you ask in My name, that will I do” (John 14:12-14). “When he asks, he must believe and not doubt, because he who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. That man should not think he will receive anything from the Lord.” (James 1:6) William Carey, the father of modern mission, said: “Believing prayer lies at the root of all personal godliness.” Believing conditions our asking.

6. Faith
“According to your faith be it unto you … If you have faith as small as a mustard seed … if you have faith and do not doubt … Have faith in God … whatever you ask … Increase our faith …” (Matthew 9:29; 17:20; 21:21; Mark 11:22; Luke 17:5) Our personal faith is not in our asking, but in the one we ask. Our discipleship is about our fitness to ask and the faith to ask. “The best thing in prayer is faith!” commented Luther. At the end of the day, it is our asking that is perhaps the clearest way that our faith expresses itself. Forsyth put it like this: “Petition is the form your faith takes … Faith is what turns need into request. It is what moves your need to need God.” Little faith, little asking. We may be tempted to stand in fear before our needs, but faith gathers those needs from the basement of helplessness, and instead of allowing them to fester and decompose the soul, presents them to God in our asking about them all. “Let us draw near to God … in full assurance of faith” (Hebrews 10:22). Fear is the antithesis of faith and will silence asking. Faith conditions our asking.

7. Abiding in Him
“I am the vine, you are the branches … If you abide in me … ask what you wish” (John 15:5-7) This proves that asking is all about relationship. The invitation to ask is not unconditional here. It is not about anything you want, any way you want it, any time that works for you. It is conditionally premised. Asking is the fruit of abiding, the manifestation of our union with Christ. Abiding results in asking. We ask of those we are intimate with. Does this not make sense of your experience? Is it not when spiritual intimacy with the Lord wanes that asking evaporates? Where abiding is shallow, so is asking. At the moment we think our asking is our invitation to God to move, to get involved, to do what we want or need, we find that it is His invitation to us to a deeper, more faithful, pleasing, expectant, intimate, abiding relationship with Him. It is His invitation to be changed into His likeness, before it is about our need for our circumstances or needs to do the changing. The changes effected by our asking will always be secondary to the changes effected in us. Abiding conditions our asking.

8. Forgiving
“And when you stand, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive him …” (Mark 11:25) Why were they standing? That was the posture for prayer. Jesus is speaking directly about what needs to be taken care of before we ask about anything. Usually, we find this first requires us to ask forgiveness for ourselves, given the delay in forgiving others, or for the contrary attitudes and feelings that have hardened in our hearts. Forgiving conditions our asking.

9. Knowing He hears
“And if we know that He hears us, whatever we ask, we know that we have what we asked of Him.” (1John 5:15) We have acknowledged that sometimes there are reasons that God refuses to listen, but that does not mean he does not or cannot hear. Questioning His hearing is often a cover for questioning ourselves. When we are waiting for an answer, God’s silence is not an inability to hear. John’s argument is simple and clear. To know He hears is to know that everything consequent to our asking is in His hands, because it is in His ears. If we are not sure that He hears, then everything is unsettled and uncertain. Knowing that God hears conditions our asking.

10. Knowing His Word
“Preserve my life according to your Word … Strengthen me according to your Word … May your unfailing love come to me according to your promise … Be gracious to me according to your promise … Direct my footsteps according to your Word … May my cry come before you O Lord; give me understanding according to your Word” (Psalm 119: 25, 28, 41, 58, 133, 169) “If …my words remain in you, ask whatever you wish …” (John 15:7) The psalmists’ asking is totally Word-based. The precepts, the promises, the proclamations and the prayers of the Word are the premise for all asking. The Word tutors our asking, giving us the matters to ask for, and giving us the very words to use. Knowing His Word conditions our asking.

11. Waiting and listening
“Those who wait on the Lord will renew their strength.” (Isa. 40:31) This is perhaps the best-known verse about waiting but it is addressed to people who are tempted to give up asking and waiting for an answer. “My cause is disregarded by God.” (40:27) The idea here is of someone bringing their case to be heard but having it continually dismissed. It is the end of their asking. But then God asks them over twenty questions. In a strange way, these divine questions are God’s answer. He is not asking in order to add to their despair, but as the God of hope, He asks them to think about what He has done until they recover their lost faith in who He is. Just like us, when we need our answer now, all these people can see are the problems that demand an answer, but as they wait, they are told to see something else.See, the sovereign Lord comes in power … See, His reward is with Him … Lift your eyes and look to the heavens” (40:10, 26). All the people can hear are the sounds of war and the cries of helplessness, but they are told to listen to something else: “A voice of one calling … the glory of the Lord will be revealed … Say to the towns of Judah, ‘Here is your God’ … Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God” (40: 3-4, 9, 21, 28). 40 days helps establish a waiting posture.

By the way, was not Jesus’ last word to the disciples before His ascension, “Wait…” (Acts 1:4)? And was not that waiting a time of asking? “They all joined together constantly in asking” (1:14). Waiting on the God of hope and listening to what He says to us while we are waiting will strengthen us to keep on asking. “I wait for God my Savior; my God will hear me.” (Micah 7:7) Waiting and listening conditions our asking.

12. Asking in Jesus’ Name
Get a copy of my booklet for this time (downstairs) but suffice it to say by way of summary that asking in Jesus’ name is an expression of assurance. We have been given His name so we are accepted by Him. We have been appointed as his name-bearing representative to ask the Father. We have been fully authorized by that name and given all the rights of access and claim that he has. Again, no wonder we can be bold and expectant. Asking in Jesus’ Name conditions our asking.

13. Not depending on our own understanding
To ask is to acknowledge that we do not have it all together. Asking ensures that we do not “lean on our own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5) It is precisely our lack of understanding that should provoke us to ask: “If any of you lacks wisdom, he should ask God, who gives generously…” (James 1:5) As long as we are asking we are not claiming that we have the measure of everything. By spending 40 days post-resurrection opening the disciples’ minds to “understand the scriptures” (Luke 24:45) Jesus laid the foundation for their asking. Our asking is “in the Spirit so whenever we ask, we are engaging the “Spirit of wisdom and understanding” (Isaiah 11:2; Ephesians 1:17) Asking for understanding was one of Paul’s major concerns: “We have not stopped praying and asking God to fill you with the knowledge of his will through spiritual wisdom and understanding … I pray … so that you will have a full understanding of everything good” (Colossians 1:9; Philemon v6). Daniel’s experience illustrates all the moving parts. It was because he “understood from the scriptures” that he was moved to “plead with Him in prayer and petition”. The outcome was the understanding that he needed: “I have come to give you insight and understanding.” (9:2-3, 23) Not leaning on our own understanding conditions our asking.

14. Fasting
“When you pray … When you fast” (Matthew 6:5, 16). Jesus teaches asking and fasting as related subjects. Scripture describes them as a combined action, both in the Old Testament (Ezra 8:23) and in the New, as practiced by the early church (Acts 14:23). In scripture, turning from food was always representative of turning to the Lord, and asking of Him. Asking with fasting is one of God’s means to encourage us:
• To be heavenward: “He answers him from His holy heaven” (Psalm 20:6). There is such a focus and consciousness of heavenly presence and purposes, and a deliverance from earthly distractions (Nehemiah 9:6). The asking-fast called in Joel (1:14; 2:15) brought a revelation of God on His “holy hill” (3:17) and what was going to take place in the heavens (2:29-30).
• To be holy: “They stood and confessed their sins” (Nehemiah 9:1-3). The sense of heavenly presence brings conviction of sin: “Our sins are higher than our heads and our guilt has reached to the heavens” (Ezra 9:6). As a result of a “chosen” asking-fast “your righteousness will go before you” (Isaiah 58:8).
• To be humbled: “I humbled my soul by fasting” (Psalm 69:10). “I proclaimed a fast ... that we might humble ourselves before our God” (Ezra 8:21). It is the clothing of humility that acknowledges that there is no other ground for sustenance other than asking for intimacy with God.
• To be heard: “So we fasted and petitioned our God about this, and He answered our prayer” (Ezra 8:23). “They declared a fast … He had compassion and did not bring upon them the destruction He had threatened” (Jonah 3:5-10). “Declare a holy fast … Let them say ‘Spare your people’ … The Lord will reply to them” (Joel 2:17-19). Empty barrels ring loudest!
• To hear: Daniel pleads with God: “In prayer and petition, in fasting” (9:3). He asks to be heard: “Hear the petitions of your servant … Give ear O God … O Lord listen” (9:17-19). But while he was asking he heard an answer. “As soon as you began to ask an answer was given, which I have come to tell you …” (9:23). Kierkegaard articulated the need here: “The true relation of prayer is not when God hears what is prayed for, but when the person praying continues to pray until he is the one who hears, who hears what God wills.” Asking with fasting is not just in order to be heard by God, but in order to hear what God is saying.
• To be helped: The loss of natural energy through fasting is a picture of the desperate need for the Lord’s help to supply what is needed, as human resource has failed. In response to asking-fasting God said, “You will call and I will answer” (Isaiah 58:9) and this is affirmed by the avalanche of active verbs that describe his response: “I am sending … I will drive out … I will repay … I will pour out … I will gather … your light will break forth … the Lord will guide … He will satisfy … you will be like … you will be called … you will find … I will cause you to” (Joel 2-3, Isaiah 58)
• To be healed: In some circumstances there seems to be a necessary relationship between the bodily discipline of fasting and the physical experience of healing, as well as the spiritual experience of deliverance. “Your healing will quickly appear … This kind only comes out with prayer and fasting” (isaiah 58:8; Mark 9:29) Fasting conditions our asking.

15. Desiring
“May He give you the desire of your heart … May the Lord grant all your requests” (Psalm 20:4-5). “Whatsoever things you desire, when you ask …” (Mark 11:24). “My heart’s desire and prayer to God …” (Romans 10:1) There is a relationship between desire and asking, affirmed by David, Paul and Jesus Himself. Notice that in every case, the expression of asking is preceded by the experience of desire. All the logistics of asking (when we ask, why we ask, what we ask for) are evidence of the longings of the heart, most particularly, the desire for God. Catherine of Siena taught that effective asking was “not attained by the use of many words but through the affection of desire.” Augustine understood that “God wishes our desire to be exercised in prayer.” So if we are not asking much for spiritual things, then it is evidence that we do not desire much. Murray confirmed this: “Desire is the soul of prayer, and the cause of insufficient and unsuccessful prayer is very much to be found in the lack or feebleness of desire.” Desire conditions our asking.

16. Seeking and submitting to His will
“If we ask anything according to His will He hears us.” (1John 5:13) This is best exemplified by Jesus in Gethsemane, at the moment of His greatest need to have God answer what He asked for: the cup of judgment to be taken from Him. He was not answered according to His need but according to God’s will. How effective was this? The outcome was not that He was personally saved from the cup of judgment but the whole world would be offered the taste of the cup of His blessing. Seeking and submitting are two constituents within a single response. “Your will be done” (Matthew 6:10) “He listens to the godly man who does His will.” (John 9:31) Seeking and submitting to his will conditions our asking.

17. Loving the believers
“If our hearts do not condemn us we have confidence before God and receive from Him anything we ask because we do His commands … and this is His command ...to love one another as He commanded.” (1John 3:21-23) John’s memory of Jesus’ last words was clear. Jesus, after giving the disciples the new command, that they love one another (John 13:34), goes on to talk about asking in His name. Not to live with love for other believers runs interference with our asking. Love is an effective incentive to ask with others and for others Is the size of a prayer meeting the true indicator of the level of love in the community? Loving the believers conditions our asking.

18. Unity in agreement:
In John 17 Jesus asks His Father “by the power of Your name – the name You gave Me – so that they may be one as we are one.” (17:11) It is the unity of the Father and Son, of whom we ask, that calls for the unity of those who ask of them. “If two of you on earth agree for anything that you ask for, it will be done for you by My Father in heaven.” (Matthew 18:19-20) We are asking together of the Father, in the unity of sons and daughters, consequently now brothers and sisters, agreed about each other’s request but also about who the Father is. It is interesting to note that the two or three who are gathered are not praying for unity. The key to that experience of unity was the asking. Paul knew the power of this united agreement of brothers: “I urge you, brothers … to join me in my struggle by praying to God for me” (Romans15:30). Agreement and unity condition our asking.

19. Boldness
“We may approach God with freedom and confidence” (Ephesians 3:12). “And this is the confidence that we have in Him, that if we ask …” (1 John 5:14-15). “Having therefore boldness to enter the holiest by the blood of Jesus” (Hebrews 10:19). Charles Wesley understood it: “Bold I approach the eternal throne!” The Greek word used for ‘bold’, ‘parrhesia’, was the word used to describe how Jesus talked about His Father (John 16:25) and how He walked about the country (John 11:54), so much so that on one occasion Peter tried to “rebuke” Him for it and tone Him down (Mark 8:32). Not surprisingly, it is the word that describes the early church in its preaching (Acts 2:29; 13;46) and in its praying (1 John 5:14). Is it surprising that this was something they asked for (Acts 4:29) and received (Acts 4:31)? The word describes confident asking of God that originally had political usage, describing the freedom of speech of those who were citizens and did not need to fear when they shared their convictions. It is the word used to describe how we approach God when we ask (Hebrews 4:16, 10.19; 1 John 5:14) When we ask we are never speaking out of turn so we need not be self conscious in His presence, but bold. The scepter has been extended to us in the throne room, so we can come with a firm tread, not mistaking humility for servility (Esther 5:2).
John Newton wrote:
My soul, ask what thou wilt
Thou canst not be too bold
Since His own blood for thee he spilt
What else can he withhold?

Boldness conditions our asking.

20. Knowing God as our Friend
Jesus’ parable of the ‘Friend at Midnight’ tells us that God’s fatherhood is a reason for our boldness (Luke 11: 2-13) But He speaks of God’s friendship as well. “Suppose one of you has a friend, and he goes to him at midnight ...” For anyone who thinks that a father has to give to his asking child because that is what he is obliged to do, Jesus affirms that our Father is also our Friend, assuring us that His response is not reluctantly paternalistic but freely and kindly altruistic. Friendship gives a boldness to asking, with its assurance of being loved and cared for, and with its expectation of a responsiveness that does not require argument and persuasion. Knowing God as Friend conditions our asking.

21. Expectation
“Ask and it shall be given you.” (Matthew 7:7) It is Jesus’ teaching and His invitation to ask that is the foundation for our expectation. Again and again, He invites His followers to ask with the expectation that what they lack they will receive, that what is lost to them they will find, that what is closed to them will be opened. This same expectation is taught by Paul. “To Him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine” (Ephesians 3:20). Melanchthon wrote about Martin Luther that he insisted on the promises in the Psalms “as if he was sure his petitions would be granted.” Is that how we ask? According to E.M.Bounds: “The reason why we obtain no more … is because we expect no more.” Our expectation conditions our asking.

22. Experience of the Holy Spirit:
“According to His power that is at work within us …” (Ephesians 3:20) All asking is both ‘in’ and ‘with’ the Holy Spirit, thus it follows that in order to ask effectively, we need the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives. Without that reception, asking will be just a recitation. Our asking cannot be a spiritual work unless it is energized by the Holy Spirit. “Would we pray efficiently and mightily?” asks E.M.Bounds. “Then the Holy Spirit must work in us efficiently and mightily… Would you pray with mighty results? Seek the mighty workings of the Holy Spirit in your own spirit.” The measure we receive will be evident in the manner in which we then ask. The relationship between the Holy Spirit and prayer is inviolable. We ask for the Spirit and then we ask in the Spirit. So when it comes to asking “according to His power” let us ask for the Holy Spirit. When it comes to praying in the Holy Spirit, let the Spirit ask through us. Any which way … ASK! Our experience of the Holy Spirit conditions our asking.

23. Pleasing him with uncondemned hearts:
“I will do the very thing you have asked because I am pleased with you” (Exodus 33:17); “If our hearts do not condemn us, we have confidence before God and receive from him anything we ask, because we obey his commands and do what pleases him” (1John 3:22). Where there is no condemnation, John says that our hearts will be “at rest in His presence.” Condemnation, like a dripping tap, erodes our sense of being qualified to ask. It sidelines us and we feel spiritually benched, excluded from the huddle that asks about life on the field of play. Its nagging accusation subverts assurance and therefore boldness. Freedom from condemnation is basic to our confidence in asking boldly and effectively. An uncondemned heart conditions our asking.

24. Importunity
“Ask and keep on asking … knock and the door will be opened … to show them that they should always pray and not give up…” (Matthew 7:7; Luke 18:1) According to Jesus, the only possible alternative to persistent asking would be to quit altogether, to “give up”. Jesus encouraged persistence in His teaching (Luke18) and in His practice (Luke 22). This is about asking that is consistent, insistent and persistent.

The willingness to see how far we can go in our pursuit of God’s will is vital, but it will feel uncomfortable, as it did for Abraham, who asked again and again for Sodom against ridiculous odds. This is the kind of asking that goes all the way. He says, “Now that I have been so bold as to speak …” (Genesis 18:27) Is this precocious, or presumptuous? It is not treated by God as such.

We are submissive in heart but not necessarily in tone. But it is our ignorance that persists in pursuing His knowledge about the matter; our continuing hopelessness that persists in pursuing His help; our continuing pains that persist in asking for His poultices of healing and deliverance. The persistence has its own rewards other than that which is sought after, as importunity purifies our own nature, provoking sanctifying changes in us that bring us to a place of preparedness where the answer is now possible. Persistence conditions our asking.

25. Unceasing
“Give him no rest” (Isaiah 61:2). “Pray without ceasing … Prayer was made without ceasing” (1Thessalonians 5:17; Acts12:5). The asking that is needed to be instant (Romans 12:12) may also have to be constant (Romans 1:9). Our persistence is serial – there is a time component. Our persistence needs to be unceasing. Forsyth called unceasing prayer “the bent of the soul.” The gap between our asking and God’s answering is more asking. This is neither filling time (as if life stops until we are answered on our terms) nor doing time (as if the waiting was an imposed limit on our freedom). The Greek word for asking (ektenes) that describes the early church’s praying, means extended, really stretched out. Asking is literally a stretch, in two senses: in that it requires extended time and effort, but also in that it seems to be beyond our capacities and capabilities, and a stretch for us to do. But this is the same word that is used to describe Jesus’ asking in Gethsemane (Luke 22:44). He was stretched to the limit of comprehensible tautness of spirit and intensity of emotion. No wonder we need the Holy Spirit as our helper when we ask, not only to get us to the place of asking but also to help us to stay there. Unceasing asking is also necessary for those situations in which we can no longer continue to act, having engaged them at one time. Paul planted the church in Thessalonica but he could not stay there to grow it. Instead, he continued to nurture it by watering it with his unceasing asking “night and day asking exceedingly for you” (1Thessalonians 3:10) Incessant constancy conditions our asking.

26. Personal holiness
We cannot ask God for his name to be hallowed if there is no place for holiness in our lives. Asking (as in the Lord’s prayer) is a frisk test for discipleship. Asking fails “when the desire and effort for personal holiness fails.” There is a symbiotic relationship between asking and holiness. Not only does unholiness hinder and impede our asking but Wesley noted that the neglect of asking “is a … grand hindrance to holiness.” Pere la Combe, the Spiritual Director of Madame Guyon, was attributed with this maxim: “He who has a pure heart will never cease to pray, and he who will be constant in prayer shall know what it is to have a pure heart.” Personal holiness conditions our asking.

27. Being specific
“What do you want me to do for you?” (Luke 18:41) Our specific asking is what Jesus asks of us. Though his blindness was obvious to all, Jesus wanted the blind man to acknowledge his personal and particular need, and confess his desire for Jesus to answer Him. There is often an evasion, even a dishonesty, possibly a cover-up in our vague and generalized prayers. As the old saying goes, ‘We aim at nothing in particular and hit it every time!’ We confess sin in general but do not ask for forgiveness for anything in particular. We pray for everyone in general but no one by name and need. We ask God to bless the world but do not engage the nations. Hedging and fudging are what we do best. This may be an indication that we are not as zealous for God’s work, or as desperate for ourselves and others as we should be. “It is most proper in prayer, to aim at great distinctness of supplication.” Spurgeon went on to talk about all the prayers that are uttered that contain “a great deal of very excellent doctrinal and experimental matter uttered, but little real petitioning, and that little in a nebulous kind of state, chaotic and unformed. But it seems to me that prayer should be distinct, the asking for something definitely and distinctly because the mind has realized its distinct need of such a thing, and therefore must plead for it. It is well not to beat round the bush in prayer, but to come directly to the point.” If you are hungry you will ask specifically for food! Nothing else will do. Our asking must be definite and explicit. Spurgeon always emphasized this: “We greatly need to be more definite in our supplications than we usually are. We pray for everything in such a way that we practically pray for nothing. It is good to know what we want”. Asking brings the facts as they are, fearful or challenging as they are, into the presence of God. When you ask in broad brush strokes, it is no wonder that you are skeptical about the answers some people get that are the finest of bristles: the exact answer needed, at the exact time. One reason that specific asking begins to decline is simply because busyness has overtaken our time to meditate, to reflect, to consider, to inquire about what is going on, and specifically needs to be asked about. A sound-byte world reduces our asking to the same shallowness. If we are ignorant of God’s will, if we are distanced from God’s heart, it is unlikely that we will be specific, especially about what God himself specifically cares about. We can and should ask ‘straight-out’ and ‘allout’. If our assurance about asking is wavering, we will be less sure and less direct in our asking, and because there will be a lack of boldness, assurance will give way to ambiguity and uncertainty. According to John Rice, “Where there is no definiteness in prayer … there is no burden, no urgency, no heart desire.” Spurgeon taught against what he called “indistinct generalizing prayer” which “fails for lack of precision. It is as if a regiment of soldiers should all fire off their guns anywhere. Possibly some-body would be killed, but the majority of the enemy would be missed.” Nor is Murray: “Our prayers must be a distinct expression of definite need, not a vague appeal to his mercy or an in-definite cry for his blessing.” Being specific conditions our asking.

Hopefully it is clear that every conditioning factor mentioned, at the end of the day, conditions the specificity of our asking and its effectiveness. You could do no worse than take each of the above points and begin by making them your asking-list. Ask for each of these characteristics to be distinctive in your asking.

ASKING AND SONSHIP

Dearest Family,

Welcome back to all the women who attended the Women’s Retreat. Good reports and testimonies have ensued. On Sunday, in keeping with the men’s study theme this year of ‘sonship’, I was asked to speak on some aspect of ‘asking and sonship’. It was not a men’s meeting because ‘sonship’ is not a gender term in scripture but a dominant metaphor for our relationship to the Father as sons and daughters. C. S. Lewis, who had a tragically sad relationship with his own father, wrote: “When the Bible talks of ‘sons of God’ this brings us up against the very center of theology.” I might add that it brings us to the very center of our understanding of prayer, of asking, but sadly the relation between assurance of sonship (intimacy with God as Father) and the practice of prayer (asking of the Father) is rarely treated in books about God’s fathering. This is a significant oversight.

There are three fundamental truths that are the foundation of our asking. The first is that God hears our asking; the second is that He responds. Both of these attributes give “confidence” (1 John 5:14) to our asking. But there is a third, which is the most foundational one, which Jesus most emphasized in His teaching and exampled in His practice. To those who love God and are His sons and daughters by spiritual adoption, He is the Father. It is this familial and filial relationship and trust that essentially grounds and secures our confidence in asking. As P.T.Forsyth described it, “He (Jesus) made the all-knowing Fatherhood the ground of true prayer. We do not ask as beggars but as children.” Jesus taught that we were to ask in a child-like way of the Father. Bonhoeffer understood the relationship between these two truths. “The child learns to speak because the father speaks to him. He learns the speech of his father. So we learn to speak to God because God has spoken to us and speaks to us.” He understood that the reason we can ask in the first place, is because we have the speech of the Father, and when we ask, we are simply repeating the Father’s “own words after Him.” It is the most natural thing in the world for children to ask the Father. Jesus assumed this.

  • He said that if earthly fathers will give their sons what they ask, “How much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him” (Luke11:13). Every answer to every prayer is premised on God’s fatherhood – on his fatherly response to His sons and daughters.

  • When the disciples ask Jesus how they can ask in prayer, what are Jesus’ first two words? “Our Father.”

  • How did Jesus always ask? “Father, Lord of heaven and earth” (Matthew 11:25); “My Father if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me” (Matthew 26:39).

  • Following the raising of Lazarus, Jesus makes clear the ground of his assurance for His own asking: “Father I thank you that you have heard me” (John 11: 41).

  • If last words give any indication to what is of utmost importance, then we should note that in the Last Supper discourse, Jesus references the Father 44 times and 6 times in his ‘high priestly’ prayer: “I will ask the Father …” (John 14:16); “Father, the time has come” (John 17:1); “Do you think I cannot ask my Father for twelve legions of angels” (Matthew 26:53).

  • So when it came to asking, it is clear that the apostles got what Jesus taught: “Since you call on a Father” (1Peter 1:17); “We have an advocate with the Father” (1John 2:1). Paul got it: “I keep asking … the glorious Father … For this reason I kneel before the Father” (Ephesians 1:17; 3:14). Like Jesus, and like the apostles, our asking is related to our assurance of God’s fathering. But our asking does not begin in our relationship with Father, Son and Holy Spirit, but in their relationship with each other.

Do you see what all this means for our asking? It is not just some expression of our need initiated by us. The asking Godhead invites us to boldly ask. Our asking has been elevated, honored, and blessed. The Father invited the Son to ask him. The Son did. The Son now asks us to ask the Father. We do. They invite us to insert our asking into their communications with each other. They all get in on it, and they respond to it, and thereby we discover this relationship between asking and accessing. To ask is to access the Trinity no less. May 10, 2017 This also helps us understand what the main outcome of our asking is all about. It is not our particular answer, but as Jesus put it, “This is to my Father’s glory!” (John 15:8) John Piper comments: “The first function of prayer is to pray that people will pursue the glory of God.” Our asking is the great means to the glorification of God no less. “Ask and I will do whatever you ask in my name … so the Son may bring glory to the Father” (John 14:13). The more asking the more glory to God, not just from us but from Jesus Himself. Asking is a way we express our pursuit of His glory in all the earth. Was this not the entire point and purpose of Jesus’ asking in His last hours? “Father … glorify your son that your son may glorify you.” In a theology of asking it is the fatherhood of God, and consequently our assured sonship, that is the premise for all assurance about the naturalness, the necessity, the appropriateness, the liberty, the expectation, the confidence of asking. The only limit on our asking is the limitation of our relationship with the Father.

The evidence of the New Testament is theologically conclusive and therefore persuasive about this. Asking of ‘the Father’ is the essential expression of prayer. The fatherhood of God is the underpinning of the apostles’ theology of asking. Just before he tells us that it is the Spirit who helps us when we do not know what we should ask for, Paul tells us that the most instinctive cry of the Spirit of sonship through us is “Abba, Father!” (Romans 8:15,26) Asking is the response of a son to the Father. It is what sons do all the time. The Apostle James understood that everything we ask for, including wisdom and every good and perfect gift, comes from the Father, the God he exhorts us to ask. (James 1: 5,17). Peter understands that we “call on a Father” (1 Peter 1:17) The object of all asking and the consequent source of all answering is the Father. This was the bedrock conviction of the early church as it asked of God from the very beginning, when their asking of the Father in the upper room, imitative of Jesus’ asking of the same Father for the same thing, received that commonly desired answer of the Father, the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Any weakening of our sense of sonship, anything that subverts our assurance of His fatherhood and fathering, will be a weakening in our confidence to ask, or a redirecting of our asking from Father to other sources. There are many who will religiously acknowledge the Fatherhood of God in a creational or creedal sense, but do not know God in a personal fathering sense, not because God is an absent uninvolved father, but because they have such distortions of fatherhood through injurious parental experience; or because, though spiritual sons and daughters, they are actually living as orphans or slaves in the Father’s house.

I went on to look at how and why the orphan or slave spirit is so destructive of asking. I urge you to download the message and understand these important observations, if not for your own prayer life, for helping others to whom you minister.

The bondages I talked about gag the asking. When there is a fracture in our assurance of our relationship with the Father, for whatever reason, and when we are tempted to live as a slave or orphan instead of a son, the external conflicts with circumstance and the internal conflicts with self, will eliminate our asking. You do not ask of a source you have chosen not to trust. Anger and pride, hostility and hopelessness, fear and resignation, do not ask. But it is because we are sons and daughters that we are free to ask of the Father. That God is our Father is the glorious truth that validates our asking; that nurtures and us as we wait in the answer-gap for the responses to our asking. What above all things assures our asking, and anchors our theology of asking? In the words of Jesus: “Father, I thank you that you have heard me” (John11:41). Jesus’ Father heard and responded to His Son. He will respond to you too, dear son and daughter of His. Begin asking with the same words Jesus used: “My Father!”

Your asking-brother (because we have the same Father),

Stuart

(2017) ANSWERED ASKING PT. 3

Dearest Family,

No one is surprised when the problems of unanswered asking are raised, but given that answered asking far exceeds what is unanswered, perhaps we should be surprised at how weak our response often is to these answers, whether measured by little gratitude, limited worship, by a lack of appreciation for what was effected and what it took to effect it, or by a lack of consideration about what further responses these answers require of us. The pain of what is unanswered usually shouts louder than the praise for what has been answered. This lack of response to asking when it is answered should be as significant a concern to us as our unanswered asking, and on Sunday, I suggested that we need to stop and take stock once in a while. The first thing that should move us, and uncork our gratitude, is how gracious God is in answering us at all, given the inconsistency and infrequency of our asking, what Spurgeon described as “the intermittent spasms of our importunity.” Just to realize that our weak asking got such a strong response, because of the strength of the One asked, not the one asking, should be sufficient to unstop the wells of worship of the character of God, particularly His kindness and grace. I covered a lot of ground on Sunday, and shared significant meditation from an OT and NT passage: 1 Samuel 1 and Luke 17. I have no space to rehearse all the points, so why don’t you take these passages and make them the subject of your own meditation in homegroup this week, and ask the question: what are the returns of answered asking? The Samuel passage is a brilliant insight into this, illustrating that our answers are not about our gratification but God’s glorification.

We are familiar with Jesus’ healing of the ten lepers, only one of whom “came back” (Luke 17:11- 19). He is described as “praising God in a loud voice.” Given the responsiveness of our Father to what we ask of Him, He should be hearing a lot more noise! I have argued in teaching over many years for a ‘return of asking’ (bringing back specific asking) but what I emphasized on Sunday was that there should be a ‘return’ from our answers, in the same sense as a return on an investment. The words of Jesus have a disturbing echo: “Was no one found to return” (Luke 17:18). If this incident was a rough guide to the returns of our responsiveness to our answer, to the return God gets out of all that He invests in us, then we are all, including God, in a place of sad deficit. Someone might look at this and say, ‘Hey, one in ten ain’t bad – that’s a 10% return on the invested healing power of God!’ Unfortunately, it’s nothing of the kind. They were all healed. It should be seen as a 90% loss. The thought that only one in ten God-given answers may provoke a volley of God-worthy thanksgiving, and God-pleasing returns, is hard to take and unacceptable. The nonreturn of the other nine lepers was an awful and unacceptably bad return on the answer.

My appeal to you was to continue to ask of the Lord, regardless, as all ten lepers did in their need. They were all motivated to be obedient and satisfy the requirement of the law to show themselves to the priest. Of course, grace outran the obedience to the law, and they were all cleansed on the way. But was this going to be a compliance, that obtained for them the answer they wanted, namely their health, or would it be a spiritual obedience that would secure for the Father what Jesus hoped the answer would bring – namely His glory? Goodwin sums it up: “A thing obtained by prayer, as it came from God, so a man will return it to God, and use it for His glory.”

My appeal on Sunday was that we observe and consider the meaning of His answers, as much as we express concern over apparently unanswered prayers. Let us savor and steward the grace January 17, 2017 of His answers, with the expectation that this grace will abound in us more and more, so that our asking and God’s answering will be ceaseless, and all the ‘returns’ will be to His glory, with thanksgiving. Thomas Goodwin was clear: “If you observe not his answers, how shall you bless God and return thanks to him for hearing your prayers? ... The reason you pray so much and give thanks so little is that you observe not God’s answers.” To put it another way, the answer is never the end of the story. The answer that may have ended our need, is but the means to re-introduce us to what our Father God needs of us.

The leper who did offer a return on the answer he received, was referred to by Jesus as a “foreigner” because he was a Samaritan. He should not have qualified for attention, for access to ask. That is a second reason why Jesus should have had nothing to do with him. There are as many good reasons for why Jesus should not answer our asking, as there were for this man. He was a leper so Jesus should have stayed away from him. There was a distance that they shouted over, but believe it or not, Jesus can answer from a distance – even when we are more distant because of our spiritual unhealth. Realize that when he returns to give thanks to Jesus, he is already healed. Yet Jesus says to him, “Rise and go; your faith has made you well” (17:19). This was not spoken to any of the other nine, who equally got healed and thus got their answer. I think this is telling us that it is not just all about the answer we wanted and received. That is not in fact the end of it. Only in this returning one, was there the returns of faith, and a personal deepening of relationship with Jesus. The return here was that the ex-leper, in throwing himself at Jesus’ feet, worshiped Him for who He was, not just thanked Him for what He did in the answer He had given.

Nine of the ten did not steward their answer, were not changed as they could and should have been, and their return was simply to life without a deeper revelation of Jesus, to life as was considered normal, or life as it had been before that need. I referred to such ‘bad returns’ on Sunday that can happen after we have received the grace of God’s answers. Having asked for and received the answer of:

  • forgiveness, let there not be a return of unforgiveness in towards others, or a return to the confessed sin; 

  • revelation let us not return to willful ignorance; 

  • blessing on our life let us not return to cursing on our lips; 

  • mercy let us not return to mean-spiritedness; 

  • joy let us not return to self-piteous misery; 

  • assurance let us not return to anxiety;

  • faith let us not return to unbelief; 

  • cleansing let us not return to compromising; 

  • humility let us not return to pridefulness of heart; 

  • deliverance, let us not return to a “yoke of bondage”; 

  • guidance, let us not return to a pattern of self-direction; 

  • provision, let us not return to any indiscipline that accounted for unnecessary lack; 

  • wisdom, let us not return like a fool to his folly; 

  • escape from ungodly cultural influences, let us not look back like Lot’s wife.

These are clearly bad ‘returns’ on good answers. It is the primary return of thanksgiving that one of the lepers experienced and expressed that is the obvious first response to answered asking, the first return, completing the circle of asking that began with “asking with thanksgiving” (Phil. 4:6). Jesus asked, “Were not all ten cleansed? Where are the other nine?” (17:17) Who knows what they returned to, and what returns there were on their miraculous answer. For the nine, there were no Godward returns apparently. Equally, the Lord says to us, “Have you not all received answers to your asking? Where are the returns?”

Inquiringly yours,

Stuart

(2017) UNANSWERED ASKING PT. 2

Dear Family,

Just like us, C.S.Lewis wondered why some of our asking goes unanswered. He wrote: “I have no answer to my problem, though I have taken it to about every Christian I know.” However, although he felt that part of the problem was perhaps his lack of faith, this did not leave him skeptical or cynical about asking. On the contrary. Why? Because he did not actually believe that the refusal of asking, the unanswered asking, was the main issue, as there were so many other possible reasons for unanswered requests. But are there enough reasons to close the gap between our asking and God’s apparent non-answering? Lewis suggested a couple: asking for what is not good, and asking for something, the granting of which, would involve the refusal of another’s request. Though unanswered asking is a permissible discussion, I would argue that there are not enough reasons to close the gap completely. Though I agree with some that there is a reason for every unanswered prayer, I do not believe that they are all discoverable, or that it is even necessary to discover them. The faith that we need to ask is the same faith that we need to be operative when an answer is not forthcoming. Reasons alone will never close the gap.

That agreed, on Sunday I gave a very compact and intense presentation (six messages in one!) of some possible ways to understand unanswered asking that were not intended to be definitive or prescriptive, but an attempt to point out some of the ways of ordering our understanding of unanswered asking, without it being an inflexible classification. There is no way I can do justice to the content of the message in this form, or the range of reference that I employed. Suffice it that I just list the different points.

  1. Unlistened to not unanswered (disqualifications) I am referring here to asking that is not answered by God because it is not listened to by God at all, for the reasons given in scripture for a divine refusal to listen, including: choosing other lordship, willful disobedience, meaningless religion, living a double life, refusing compassion to others, disregard for injustice or a denial of justice, appearance without reality, unconfessed and unrepented sin, deliberate rejection of God’s commands, pride, idolatry, ritualistic repetition, unforgiveness, disunity, enmity, hypocrisy, double-mindedness, broken marital relationships, condemnation, not asking according to His will and word, asking with wrong motives, from wrong sources, for wrong things – failure to ask at all.

  2. Inappropriate to ask (disavowals) Just as it is allowable to study possible reasons for unanswered asking, it is also sometimes advisable to give a little more forethought to what we are actually asking about, to ensure that what we are asking for is not going to be subject to a divine disavowal, according to the revealed will and word of God. Sometimes, there are more questions we should perhaps ask before asking, that ascertain what to ask for, how to ask, why we ask. Spurgeon thought that: “Some prayers would never be offered if men did but think … See whether it is an assuredly fitting thing to ask.” In response to something asked of Him Jesus said: “You don’t know what you are asking.” (Matthew 20:22) This suggests that there may be much of our asking that would never make it to the official request stage if we had considered more carefully and thoughtfully the ways and the will of the Lord for our lives. God can take no responsibility or give any support to something asked which is inappropriate, which is non-sense or which contravenes God-given laws of nature, or which contradicts His own nature and character, His will and His word.

  3. The waiting game (delays) This is such a common experience that I spent most time on it, and you will have to listen to the download to get all the points made, both about its challenges as well as its fruits. Scripture records something that is often asked of God by psalmists and by prophets: “Lord, how long?” The reason that delayed answers get labeled so quickly as ‘unanswered’ ones has to do with the difficulty of waiting. Is anything happening when nothing’s happening? We can relate to the voices of scripture: “How long must your servant wait?” (Psalm119:84) “How long O Lord?” (Revelation 6:10) They were told to “wait a little longer”! “How long till you restore the kingdom?” (Acts 1:6) It is interesting that the last thing the disciples ever said to Jesus was this unanswered question. Waiting requires patience and therein lies the rub. Scripture exhorts us to “eagerly wait.” John Stott puts it perfectly: “We are to wait neither so eagerly that we lose our patience, nor so patiently that we lose our expectations, but eagerly and patiently together.There is no question that delays can be dangerous to spiritual health. Spurgeon warned his congregants that they had an enemy who opposed their relationship with the Lord and would sponsor any wedge between them: “But we must be careful not to take delays in prayer for denials … We must not suffer Satan to shake our confidence in the God of truth by pointing to our unanswered prayers. Unanswered petitions are not unheard.” Yes, he acknowledged that delays were great “trials of faith” but he was as eager to point out, as we must, that delayed answers also “give us support to honor God through our steadfast confidence in Him.”

  4. Taking no for an answer (denials) Unlike ‘disavowals’, I am talking here about asking which may be denied even though it is likely be an appropriate desire, a legitimate request given present perceptions, a reasonable inquiry given current understanding. It is the apparent acceptability and desirability of what is asked for that makes the acceptance of a denial so difficult. Although it is true that delays are not denials, it is easy to understand why an interminable delay will be assumed to be a denial. Having said that, there seem to be denials. Scripture presents us with some examples. What is interesting is that they were all experienced by stellar saints, one of them being the saintliest of all, Jesus. Check the message to refresh your mind on the examples I gave, not only of Jesus, but of Moses, David and Paul. If denials were the membership qualification for this alumni group we would perhaps be less concerned about them.

  5. Assented to but not answered (deferrals) Some unanswered prayers are perhaps better understood as divinely willed deferrals. Our asking is necessary and timely as it is being ceaselessly expressed, but it is being ‘stored’ to be answered another day, or another time that is even beyond our sojourn on earth. Answers are about timing (the moment) as well as substance (the matter): “in an acceptable time have I heard you.” (Isa 49:8) In Scripture we observe that what is often perceived as unanswered asking is in fact a matter of God’s timing: “in the fullness of time … at the right time … when his time has come…” (Gal. 4:4; Rom. 5:6; 2 Thess. 2:6) In the incarnation narratives after 400 years of unanswered asking, this phrase litters the text: “This took place to fulfill …” There are those deferrals that will await their activation in future ages. This has been such a provocation to the asking church through the centuries, as it asked for God’s kingdom to come, as it pleaded for generations yet unborn, as it cried, “Even so come, Lord Jesus.” We could argue, as Thomas Goodwin did, that the denouement of history is going to be the fulfillment of millions of unanswered because-deferred prayers. “That may be one reason why God will do such great things towards the end of the world even because there has been so great a stock of prayers going, for so many ages, which is now to be returned.” Who would have thought that the return of our Lord was related to the return of our deferred asking. Again, “Even so come, Lord Jesus.”

  6. Creative ‘unanswers’ (deprivations, discretions, diversions ) It is never the heart of God to give us less than His goodness determines for us. These deprivations may feel like withholding of an answer but they are not the withdrawal of God’s presence. On the contrary, when we feel there is no response, it is the responsiveness of love that seeks desired relationship not just desired request. Peter Grieg affirms this: “Sometimes He may deprive us of something in order to draw us to Someone.” There is a saying that suggests that sometimes the answer to our asking is not rejected but redirected. Divine discretions do not deny the requests but apply their intentions and desires to different applications and outcomes. After our asking has pitched the way that things need to be, it is as if God says, “You are on the right track, but how about we do it like this not that?” Some times these redirections feel like radical diversions. Abraham’s prayer for Ishmael was answered in Isaac. What Moses asked for himself was to be fulfilled in Joshua. David’s prayers for the child who died revert to Solomon. David asked to build the Temple, but again, the answers were reserved for Solomon. Though the specific thing asked for was not delivered in the terms in which it was asked, nonetheless, this asking was not ‘unanswered’ but applied in a way that advanced God’s glory, fulfilling his renown more than just my request.

It is one thing to learn to plead the case, and another to learn when to rest it. We plead God’s character and covenant; we plead His will and His Word; we plead the precedents both biblical and historical; we plead Christ. We do so with all the cognitive and affective means available, with godly knowledge and godly emotions, and with all the best understanding and information at our disposal. But when all that is done there is one thing more that is needed for our asking to be effective, especially if we have concluded our asking with an ‘Amen’ thus declaring ‘Let it be.’ We need to rest the case and know how to submit to the divine deliberations and decisions of the Judge who will always do what is right, by all parties: the asker, the asked of and the asked for. As Goodwin concluded: “When a man hath put up prayers to God he is to rest assured that God will in mercy answer his prayers; and to listen diligently and observe how his prayers are answered.”

Yes, there are disqualifications and disavowals, there are delays and denials, there are deferrals and deprivations, discretions and diversions. There is no fear in recognizing these, though there may be pain in acknowledging them. However, I will choose to put my tears in bottle before I put my unanswered asking in the trash can. I will rest my case, and despite being presently unanswered, wait patiently and rest assured.

Pastorally and patiently yours,

Stuart

ASKING WITH FASTING

16 “And when you fast, do not look gloomy like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces that their fasting may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. 17 But when you fast, anoint your head and wash your face, 18 that your fasting may not be seen by others but by your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.(ESV)

Matthew 6:16-18

(2015) UNANSWERED PRAYERS, PT. 2

Dearest family,

First of all, to all those who were there on Sunday, thank you for your great support of the barbecue after church that raised funds for the education of girls who are in the church plants in northern Togo. We desire the “girl-effect” to be effective in these contexts. $20 supports a child for a year’s schooling, covering their supplies and basic classroom needs. The good news is that we raised enough to educate 100 girls for the next school year. There are 100 others that we still want to support for the 2015-2016 school year. If you were not there on Sunday and would like to be part of this collaborative TAG effort then you can send your check (made payable to: The Antioch Group) for $20 or any amount. Mail to TAG at the church address. We are so excited about supporting this mission for the third year. Thank you to you all.

There was a lot of food on Sunday and nothing was left over except a few hot dogs that will be consumed at The Porch. There was also a lot of spiritual food in the preceding sermon. If you were in attendance you will know that it is not easily reduced to a short pastoral letter so I encourage you to download it and listen to it at your own pace. I ended the last message by asking if it was possible to close the gap between our asking and His answering; between our actual speaking and His assumed hearing; between our wanting and the waiting; between what we expect and what we experience; between what we are hoping for and what is actually happening? What bridged that gap between Abraham’s childlessness and the Pleiades and Orion? But it seems that he found a way to keep staring at stars. “Against all hope Abraham in hope believed.” (Rom. 4:18) Does that settle everything for us? We do not want to accept specious rationalizations as to why our asking is in the pending tray, if in fact it made it even that far. But is it not reasonable to at least ask about some possible explanations for the “gap” that might help close it somewhat? Can we look for some reasons?

By way of introduction I recounted how C.S. Lewis articulated his thoughts about asking, which he described as “the problem without an answer”. What ‘reasons’ would Lewis have been open to countenance? Several, I think, but with a proviso. In his typical self-effacing way he offered a throw-away line at the end of his essay on the efficacy of prayer, expressing his own weakness, but gently yet firmly warning about being too dogmatic about any area that we cannot fully fathom, or about legitimate tensions that we cannot resolve but have to keep taut in order to get the whole picture. Though a permissible discussion, there are not enough reasons to close the gap.

If a friend either refused to respond to our request, or denied it altogether, we would want to ask questions and seek reasons. We look for reasons for unanswered prayer to make sense of things, to make sense of relationship with God, in the same way that Lewis did, but with the same cautions. God is not threatened by this endeavor. “If God doth not grant your petitions it will put you to study a reason of that his dealing: and so you will come to search in your prayers and the carriage of your hearts therein to see whether you did pray amiss.” (Thomas Goodwin) James does confirm that we can ask “amiss.” (Jm. 4:3) Three hundred years later, another commentator, J. Oswald Sanders conducted “a post-mortem on unanswered prayer” and suggested that “behind every unanswered prayer is a reason, which we must discover for ourselves.” (‘Prayer: power unlimited’) Peter does advise us that there are things that “hinder our prayers” (1 Pet. 3:1-7) and I mentioned well over twenty scriptural reasons for unanswered asking that are accounted for by the reasons that God refuses to listen.

What should we make of this? I would affirm Goodwin’s encouragement to us to “study” and “search” in a way that is open to check one’s own heart and humbly seek to learn, especially things that are convicting and formative for personal growth in asking. Who knows but in that process we may discover some things that will influence an answer. However, though I agree with the thought that there is a reason for every unanswered prayer, I do not believe that they are all discoverable, or that we must discover them. The faith that we need to ask is the same faith that we need to be operative when an answer is not forthcoming. Reasons alone will never close the gap.

That said, I did give a descriptive presentation (not a prescriptive one) to point out some of the possible ways of ordering our understanding of unanswered asking, without it being an inflexible classification – the kind of systemization that I argued is neither desirable nor possible. These were:

Dismissals – asking that is unheard because of reasons that God gives, not unanswered. (Ask Heran in the office if you want a more detailed list of some scriptural examples.) We are referring here to asking that is not answered by God because He refuses to listen; He chooses not to hear.

Disqualifications – This refers to inappropriate asking. For example, God can take no responsibility or give any support to something asked which is non-sense or which contravenes God-given laws of nature, or which contradicts his own nature and character, His will and His word. We cannot ask for God’s blessing on something He has clearly said He cannot bless.

Delays – This is when the prayer room becomes a waiting room. There are delays of fulfillment that appear to us as unanswered asking, but the fact is they have been heard, and more than that “decreed.” (Daniel 9:25, 26, 27) Although we are not as assured as Daniel of the ‘decree’ being a done deal, we can be equally assured that we are heard, and equally sustained to wait. That being said, it is not easy, which is why we looked at the scriptural exhortations to be patient and to wait eagerly. I love the way that John Stott put it: “We are to wait neither so eagerly that we lose our patience, nor so patiently that we lose our expectations, but eagerly and patiently together.” (The Message of Romans) Delayed answers are assumed given the scriptural emphasis on importunity and ceaseless asking.

Deferrals - Some unanswered prayers are divinely willed deferrals. Our asking is necessary and timely as it is being ceaselessly expressed, but it is being ‘stored’ to be answered another day, or another time that may well be beyond our sojourn on earth. Stephen’s last breath was asking for something which was answered after his death. Denials – This is about taking ‘no’ for an answer. Unlike ‘dismissals’, asking which may be denied will likely be an appropriate desire, a legitimate request given present perceptions, a reasonable inquiry given current understanding. It is the apparent acceptability of what is asked for that makes the acceptance of a denial so difficult. Although it is true that delays are not denials, it is easy to understand why an interminable delay will be assumed to be a denial. Having said that, there are denials. Scripture presents us with some examples, and they were all experienced by stellar saints, (we looked at Moses, David and Paul) and at one who was the saintliest of all, Jesus. If denials were the membership qualification for this alumni group we would be less concerned about them!

Divine discretions – I called these “creative unanswers”! There is a saying that suggests that sometimes the answer to our asking is not rejected but redirected. Divine discretions do not deny the requests but apply their intentions and desires to different applications and outcomes. Of course, this still feels to us like a deprivation or a diversion. After our asking has pitched the way that things need to be, it is as if God says, “You are on the right track, but how about we do it like this not that?” Abraham’s prayer for Ishmael was answered in Isaac. What Moses asked for himself was to be fulfilled in Joshua. David’s prayers for the child who died revert to Solomon. David asked to build the Temple, but again, the answers were reserved for Solomon. Though the specific thing asked for was not delivered in the terms in which it was asked, nonetheless, this asking was not ‘unanswered’ but applied in a way that advanced God’s glory, fulfilling his renown more than answer to the original request would have done.

You could argue that as great as the problem of his suffering was for Job, it was the matter of unanswered asking that gave rise to so much of his tortured argumentation. The fact that this is the concern of possibly the earliest written text in scripture, suggests how foundational this matter is to the human soul. It is God himself who gives Satan an allowance to test Job, and surely his unanswered asking tested his faith. Peter argues that the suffering of our trials “have come so that your faith - of greater worth than gold… may be proved genuine and may result in praise, glory and honor when Jesus Christ is revealed.” (1 Pet. 1:7) The good news is that the glory of God remains the outcome of the testing of faith. The bad news is that we may have to wait till the parousia for this being validated and vindicated. Calvin conceded that circumstances may convince us that God has forsaken us, and confirmed that unanswered prayer sorely tests faith. His observation does not sound very comforting, that God may have us “to lie a long time in the mire before he gives us a taste of his sweetness.” The continuance of asking at such times, with eager patience, is the outworking of faith.

Psalm 56:8 records: “You have collected all my tears in your bottle. You have recorded each one in your book.” Yet, like Job, we know how easy it is to give up and question the viability and veracity of asking. Why not just crumple the script of our asking and throw it in the ever-filling trashcan of unanswered prayer? The prelude to the Bible’s great chapter on heroes and heroines of faith is addressing those who stood their ground “in the face of suffering.” (Hebr. 10:32): “So do not throw away your confidence… have need of endurance… receive what is promised…. He who is coming will come and not delay.” (10:37) Of course, this sounds a bit rich given the fact that delay, denial, deprivation, diversion (whatever you want to call it) is characterizing the present problem. At least it affirms us, and we know that God himself is not unmindful that it really is a delay. So we have a choice. Though there is pain in what is experienced by us as unanswered, will we throw away our request into the trashcan, or will we trust our tears to the bottle? Avoiding the dismissals and disqualifications, bearing the delays and deferrals, accepting the denials, will we be discreet in trusting God’s discretions? What will our response be to unanswered asking? The trashcan or that bottle?

Pastorally yours,

Stuart

(2015) UNANSWERED PRAYERS, PT. 1

Dearest family,

CONTRARY TO MY REPEATED REFERENCES ON SUNDAY TO WHAT I WOULD BE COVERING ‘NEXT WEEK’ (I WAS WAY TOO EAGER!) MY NEXT MESSAGE ON ‘UNANSWERED ASKING’ WILL BE ON JUNE 14TH. NEXT WEEK, AS YOU ALL KNEW, IS THE WOMEN’S RETREAT AND OUR SERVICE LED BY THE MEN’S MINISTRY TEAM. SORRY ABOUT THAT!

Anyway, back to the matter in hand. There is no disagreement, either in scripture or in the historic testimony of the church, its teachers, and its congregants that there is much asking that is not answered. But there are divided opinions about how this should be perceived and understood. The trite truism that there are no unanswered prayers, because the answer is always ‘yes, no or maybe’ is a somewhat facile sounding and unhelpful place to start. No jaunty jingle will serve to provide healing balm or resolution for an unanswered asker who feels caught in the no-man’s land between the request and the response. The longer the answer is in coming, the more that space is marked out by emotional and theological barbed wire and spiritual land mines. Although silence is at first the mark of a good listener, the protracted silence to asking raises some questions: was the phone off the hook, was the phone picked up, was it just a recorded message, was it heard, did it register, will there be a return call, is the line cut?

Precisely because of the nature of the challenges, it is tempting to avoid them altogether and refuse to admit there are any possible problems. Or one can adopt the approach of the happy sloganeers whose platitudinous, ‘bumper-sticker’ style theology shouts things like ‘Let go and let God’ – peppy cheers that are always delivered from the sidelines of another’s pain. If you are hanging on to every word, when there is not even a word, then ‘letting go’ is not good advice. The other temptation is to try to impose a fool-proof, fear-proof, mystery-proof template on all the inchoate thoughts and feelings that arise, and come up with a one-stop explanation. When things do not make sense to us, it is our wont to try and rationalize what is happening as best we may, in the hope that some coherence will emerge from our confusion that will make us feel better about ourselves and more pointedly, about God. We want a system that will provide some order, that will be comforting enough to distract our attention from the irregular shaped thoughts and concerns that cannot be accommodated. It is not that the scriptures are short on counsel, but we have to resist the temptation to take all that they do say, and force it into a construct that rationalizes everything to our satisfaction. The bottom line is that there are going to be some things missing that we just do not know and some things present that we just do not understand. “A determination to know what cannot be known always works harm in the Christian heart…We dislike to admit that we do not know what is going on, so we torture our minds trying to fathom the mysterious ways of the Omniscient one. It’s hard to conceive of a more fruitless task.” (Tozer) This does not mean that we do not try at all to seek understanding - we should do so. But it does mean we are not going to be tortuous in trying to explain everything that seems to be torturing us. We are not going to call something a ‘mystery’ as a convenient cover-up for not engaging the truths and realities of a situation, nor are we going to try and rationalize what is indeed a ‘mystery’. In all our asking, there will be times when we need to discern the boundaries of our questioning an un-answering God. Others would put it more strongly: “Our insistence on being answered means we are always off track…The purpose of prayer is that we get ahold of God not the answer.” (E.M.Bounds) But as Spurgeon said: “There is no fanaticism in expecting God to answer prayer… There can be no reason for praying if there be no expectation of the Lord’s answering.” Can we have a godly expectation that does not become a fleshly insistence?

For now, “What do you define as unanswered?” is a reasonable question. The most obvious unanswered asking is simply that which was never asked in the first place – sadly. The way we most generally define ‘unanswered’ is the silence of God, the absence of His apparent response to something that has been asked to be effected on our terms and our timing, according to the needs of ourselves or others, as we perceive them best. By ‘our terms and our timing’ I am not suggesting a selfish view of things but simply the nature of the need as best understood by us. Indeed, our perceptions are not necessarily complete or even fully accurate, but our asking is unanswered to the extent that the fullest presentation of our request, with the strongest expectation possible, remains unfulfilled. Reasons why our presentation may have been inadequate or why our expectations were possibly unfounded are open for discussion, with the proviso that such an exchange is conducted with neither an offensive posture towards God, nor a defensive posture towards oneself.

On Sunday, we looked at a number of different images that have been used to capture the feelings and frustrations, the pains and problems of unanswered asking. One of these was in Lamentations.“You have covered yourself with a cloud so that no prayer can get through.” (Lam. 3:44) In the previous chapter these people described themselves as being “covered…with the cloud of his anger.” (Lam. 2:1) They are sitting alone “in the silence” of unanswered asking. “Even when I call out or cry for help, he shuts out my prayer. He has barred my way with blocks of stone.” (Lam. 3:8-9) Clouds sound more hopeful. It is a catalogue of woe. In fact, outside the crucifixion of Christ, there is no darker presentation of dereliction in scripture. This is unanswered asking of a kind that is second only to the unanswered asking of Jesus on the cross.

However, there is something for us to learn here. The silence of unanswered asking elicited some responses that many can identify with: “He has walled me in…He has weighed me down…I have been deprived of peace…my soul is downcast...” The lack of an answer that wears you down becomes the loss of much else: “My splendor is gone and all that I had hoped for from the Lord.” (3:19) All this asker can do is “remember my affliction.” The challenges of unanswered asking are not in question. However, there are three things here that teach us how to hold on and be held up.

  1. We do not have to succumb to accusing God sinfully, even though we feel that we are somehow being sinned against by the silence. They do not accuse God of being deaf, dumb and blind to their unanswered state. They know that He hears their asking: “Do not close your ear to my cry for relief.” (3:56). They know He can still speak other things to them and is not mute: “You said, Do not fear.” (3:57) They know He can see their situation: “See O Lord how distressed I am…Look O Lord…You have seen the wrong done to me…” (1:20; 2:20; 3:59) The answer they want may not have appeared but God is not absent. He is very much present.

  2. When he remembers the affliction concomitant with the silence, he chooses not to limit his remembrance to the immediate only: “Yet this I call to mind and therefore I have hope.” What makes the difference in what has already been described as a hopeless circumstance? “Because of the Lord’s great love we are not consumed, for His compassions never fail. They are new every morning; great is your faithfulness.” (3:22) The well-known hymn that we sing inspired by these words is not the confession of worshipers at joyful ease with their lovely lives. It is a classic example of the kind of praise that is forged in the furnace of affliction, in the prison cell made with those “blocks of stone” he was talking about. There is no unanswered asking that can keep out the truth about the character and nature of our God, unless we choose to refuse their remembrance, and in the process of dealing with what seem to be God’s apparent denials of us, we become deniers of Him.

  3. These acts of remembrance have a knock-on effect. They renew their asking by inviting God to join the remembrance review: “Remember O Lord what has happened to us; look and see our disgrace.” (5:1) There then follows an iteration of all the terrible things that require an answer, but this time, it does not end with a focus on their unanswered plight. It is not that they are suppressing anything because in the middle of their Godward affirmation (“You O lord reign forever”) the pained frustration unashamedly breaks through again without mincing the words: “Why do you always forget us? Why do you forsake us for so long?” (5:20) But here is the point. Despite the awful facts of their predicament, they are not asking for all the things on the unanswered asking list to be taken care of so much as for the relationship to be recovered with the unanswering Answerer: “Restore us to yourself, O Lord…renew our days as of old.” (5:21) Precisely because it is the sense of relational intimacy that is affected by unanswered asking, especially the longer it drags out, it is what becomes the greater subject of renewed asking. They were clear what they were after but was this what God was really after all this time? Their desire for Him was now more than their need for their answer. The things they wanted had been trumped by the Person they needed, even though they are still struggling with the fear that they may have been rejected.

Thus in these times of unanswered asking, closed doors are not necessarily the final word when the lubricating oil of the Holy Spirit is applied to their hinges. It is not inevitable that the sky will be as iron; cloudy, almost certainly, but as Lamentations shows us, they ultimately cannot stop us getting through, or shafts of God’s light getting through to us. But we still remain ‘unanswered.’ Is it possible to close the gap between our asking and His answering; between our actual speaking and His assumed hearing; between our wanting and the waiting; between what we expect and what we experience; between what we are hoping for and what is actually happening? What bridged that gap between Abraham’s childlessness and the sight of Pleiades and Orion? On starry nights was he tempted to stop looking up. It seems that he found a way to keep staring at stars. “Against all hope Abraham in hope believed.” (Rom. 4:18) Does that settle everything for us? We do not want to accept specious rationalizations as to why our asking is in the pending tray, if in fact it made it even that far. But is it not reasonable to at least ask about some possible explanations for the “gap” that might help close it somewhat? Can we look for some reasons? More about this next time….

Pastorally yours,

Stuart

ANSWERED PRAYERS

Dearest family,

On Sunday I argued that the lack of our response to asking when it is answered should be as significant a concern to us as our unanswered asking. We need to stop and take stock once in a while. The first thing that should move us, and uncork our gratitude, is how gracious God is in answering us at all, given the inconsistency and infrequency of our asking, or as someone put it, “the intermittent spasms of our importunity.” Just to realize that our weak asking gets such a strong response, because of the strength of the one asked, not the one asking, should be sufficient to unstop the wells of worship of the character of God.

The more we think about it, the more shocked we should be at the minimal returns from so much answered asking. If our asking is accompanied by thanksgiving anyway, then the lack of it suggests two possible things:

  1. There is actually a lot less asking going on than there could be

  2. There is a lack of thanksgiving for all the answers received to asking

We are familiar with Jesus’ healing of the ten lepers, only one of whom “came back”. (Lk. 17:11-19) He is described as “praising God in a loud voice.” I am arguing that given the responsiveness of our Father to what we ask of Him, He should be hearing a lot more noise!

The words of Jesus have a disturbing echo: “Was no one found to return…” (Lk. 17:18) If this incident was a rough guide to the return of our responsiveness to the answering response that God returned to us, then we are looking at a 10% return. (Did I say return enough times!) Again, the thought that only one in ten answers may provoke a volley of God-worthy thanksgiving is hard to take and unacceptable. In this case, the non-return of the nine is a bad return on the answer. Speaking of ‘bad returns’, having asked for the answer of forgiveness and received it, let there not be a return of unforgiveness in our hearts towards others, or a return to the confessed sin. Having asked for the answer of deliverance and received it, let us not return to a “yoke of bondage’. Having asked for the answer of guidance and received it, let us not return to a pattern of self-direction. Having asked for the answer of provision and received it, let us not return to any indiscipline that accounted for unnecessary lack. Having asked for the answer of wisdom, let us not return like a fool to his folly. Having asked for a way of escape from ungodly cultural influences and received it, let us not look back like Lot’s wife. These are clearly bad ‘returns’ on good answers.

The return of thanksgiving and praise is what asking has always been about – not the answer per se but the glorifying of God. “Call upon me…and I will deliver you and you shall glorify me.” (Ps. 50:15) His glorification trumps my gratification every time. The psalmist’s ‘return’ of praise is the fact that God “has not turned away my prayer or withheld His love from me.” (Ps. 66:20) We might add, “Therefore I will return my thanksgiving because he has not withheld an answer from me!” Commenting on this psalm, Spurgeon writes: “What a God is he thus to hear the prayers of those who come to him when they have pressing wants, but neglect him when they have received a mercy; who approach him when they are forced to come, but who almost forget to address him when mercies are plentiful and sorrows are few.” How is it then that we can be so blessed yet so ‘blah’? How is it that we take for granted what God has granted in answering our asking?

One reason for a lack of sustained expressive affection in response to answers is that our asking is often not imbued with expectation that trustingly lives in anticipation of what God is going to do when we ask. “Petitioning God entails that the petitioner expects an answer.” Sometimes the ‘blah’ begins with our ‘might-as-well’, ‘you-never-know’, ‘can’t-do-any-harm’, and ‘sure-hope-it-gets-through’ kind of asking. How different this is when compared to Solomon’s conviction that his requests would be “near to the Lord our God day and night that he may uphold the cause of his servant.” (1 Kg. 8:59) I have been taught by those like Thomas Goodwin (1600-1680) whose writings providentially ended up on my reading lists as a younger Christian. He was emphatic about the need, once having asked of God, to look earnestly for the answer, and to discern what was going on while the asking continued or while waiting ensued. “It is not enough to pray, but after you have prayed you have need to listen for an answer that you may receive your prayers. The sermon was not done when yet the preacher is done, because it is not done till practiced.” Even so, our asking is not done until we have considered the answers, even if the answer is ‘no answer’.

The fact that we received an answer speaks volumes to us of the loving, purposeful provision of God, but it will also whisper a lot of affirmations and confirmations that perhaps need to be heeded for future spiritual growth and future asking. Did you hear a dog barking? What dog? The asking for deliverance by the enslaved Israelites was raw and raucous: “the Israelites groaned in their slavery and cried out, and their cry for help…went up to God.” (Ex. 2:23) They are asking to get out of there, and they do not care how, but there are so many exquisite details in God’s answer that served to ‘quietly’ underline his power. On the night of the Exodus, who could forget “the loud wailing in Egypt”? (Ex. 11:30) But imagine a conversation a few years into the wilderness journey between Zak and Zeb:

“Hey Zeb, do you remember that night?”
“Are you kidding me, Zak? My ears are still ringing with the noise!”
“You know what’s weird Zeb? It’s not the noise I remember but the silence. Do you remember that antsy dog of mine, Nimrod? He never made a single whining, whimpering sound all night. What do you make of that?”

The text tells us what they were meant to make of that, if they “observed” the full answer. “This is what the Lord says…among the Israelites not a dog will bark at any man or animal.” But why? “Then you will know that the Lord makes a distinction between Israel and Egypt.” Through the dog’s silence, God speaks loudly about himself. The answer to their asking that was their massive national deliverance included these details, that if considered, conveyed awesome revelations about the power of God in this world, but also about how he feels about what opposes his purposes. Do you not think that Zak and Zeb, having considered how God answered their asking on that Exodus night, would want to be sure that they always stayed on the right side of God’s affections?

The point is that God’s answers, when “observed”, yield so many instructional encouragements, and sometimes, whimsical clues about who He is and how He feels about things, and about what is yet possible if these answers are stewarded well. It is understandable that given the relief of the answer, we are now ready to move ahead where we were once stymied, take care of what was on hold, renew our engagement with what was in limbo. Like the nine lepers, it is the most natural thing to get right on with our lives, now that the brake of our unanswered needs, which did everything from slowing us down to bringing us to a full stop, has made way for the accelerator of answered provision. But the truth remains that “You lose much of your comfort in blessings when you do not observe answers to your prayers.” (Thomas Goodwin) Is there any chance we can improve on the lepers’ 10% return? Do bad returns or good ones characterize your responses to God’s answers to your asking? We got what we asked for. Did He get what He was asking for?

Pastorally yours

Stuart